Re: Ethereal 0.10.12

2005-09-08 Thread ober
The patch for tethereal(1) is at http://www.linbsd.org/setuid_tethereal.patch This only works for capture mode. It takes an extra -u option for the user. So create user _ethereal then run tethereal -Nn -tad -u _ethereal -w foo or decode the output. Either way this should remove the issue of ro

Re: Ethereal 0.10.12

2005-09-08 Thread Gregory Steuck
> "Bruno" == Bruno Rohee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruno> Capturing traffic by some other mean then analysing it with Bruno> Ethereal under an unprivileged account might be safe, Bruno> actually capturing an analysing traffic with Ethereal is Bruno> definitely not, given its

Re: Ethereal 0.10.12 [X-Post, Sorry!]

2005-09-08 Thread Sebastian .Rother
Sebastian .Rother schrieb: Jakob Schlyter schrieb: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matt Jibson wrote: I believe that Ethereal has improved greatly since when it was removed from ports. surely, but has security improved? does it have privsep? until that has changed, ethereal will not come back. sor

Re: Ethereal 0.10.12

2005-09-08 Thread Bruno Rohee
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:10:41PM +0200, Sebastian .Rother wrote: > > > >surely, but has security improved? does it have privsep? until that > >has changed, ethereal will not come back. sorry. > > > >jakob > > > Then drop all ports! > Has Gnome Priv-Sep? hydra? nmap? KDE? xpdf? XMMS? mplaye

Re: Ethereal 0.10.12

2005-09-08 Thread Sebastian .Rother
Jakob Schlyter schrieb: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matt Jibson wrote: I believe that Ethereal has improved greatly since when it was removed from ports. surely, but has security improved? does it have privsep? until that has changed, ethereal will not come back. sorry. jakob Then drop a