On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Original message
> >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> >To: misc@openbsd.org
> >
> >Hi
&g
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:18:20PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > > it also has s/mime and gpg capabilities, is text based and does your
> > > laundry.
> >
> >
> > I have used mutt for a while now and it does not do my laundry.
>
> You must have forgotten the optional mutt_laundry.config file
... whi
Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> > > >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> > > >To: misc@openbsd.org
> > > >
> > > >Hi
> > > >
> > > >I have been looking into encrypting my e-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was
> thinking about GPG together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
>
> But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or
> "better" way than GPG.
GPG (and the other one, PGP) is really nothing more than a
On 10/07/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > Original message
> > >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> > >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
S/MIME (http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/smime-charter.html) is a
certificate based system.
GPG is probably more convenient for personnal use.
Cheers,
Fv
Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
> together with Sylpheed, since I am
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Original message
> >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> >To: misc@openbsd.org
> >
> >Hi
&g
Original message
>Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
>From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Encrypting e-mails
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Hi
>
>I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
together with Sylph
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:07:40PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
> together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
>
> But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than GPG.
GnuPG is pretty m
Hi
I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than GPG.
Any recommendations?
Best and kind regards,
Rico
10 matches
Mail list logo
