On Friday, 16 November 2007 at 10:52:41 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
>
> Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
Sorry about the confusion, I missed that.
It is really in th
Hi,
On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
You're mistaken about something. "Xenocara" is just the OpenBSD name
for the newest version of X.org. The 4.2 X sets include cwm. You're
probably thinking about the 4.1 X sets and earlier - they didn't
include cwm because they used an older version of X.
Again, "Xenocara" IS X. cwm requires X. Ins
On Friday, 16 November 2007 at 1:19:43 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Why? That doesn't make sense. If you want to use X, just install
> the sets.
The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
I just want to use cwm. How can I use cwm without Xenocara ?
Regards,
ZP
I want to try out the window manager cwm that comes with 4.2 Xenocara.
Does it require the sets x*42.tgz?
My plan is installing 4.2 without the sets x*42.tgz. Then extract
xenocara.tgz to /usr/src/ and follow the instruction in
/usr/src/xenocara/README to build xenocara.
Are they the correct steps
On 2007/11/16 12:09, Zoong PHAM wrote:
> My plan is installing 4.2 without the sets x*42.tgz.
Why? That doesn't make sense. If you want to use X, just install
the sets.
6 matches
Mail list logo