On 2024-09-01, Elie Le Vaillant wrote:
> On Fri Aug 30, 2024 at 11:56 AM CEST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> imho you should really be looking for a 64 bit machine if you want to
>> run a web browser.
>
> I am aware that this machine is simply unsufficient for web usage. My
> personal computer needs
On Fri Aug 30, 2024 at 11:56 AM CEST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> imho you should really be looking for a 64 bit machine if you want to
> run a web browser.
I am aware that this machine is simply unsufficient for web usage. My
personal computer needs are quite small. Base, RSS, groff, mpv, and
links
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:56:13AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> imho you should really be looking for a 64 bit machine if you want to
> run a web browser.
Lynx runs just fine on my i386 ;-)
On 2024-08-29, Elie Le Vaillant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently daily-driving a 2008 i386 machine on
> -current. Earlier this month, I tried out ungoogled-chromium,
> which was available as a package at the time. I've
> tried again today, and though the ports tree still
> lists i386 as a valid p
Hello,
I'm currently daily-driving a 2008 i386 machine on
-current. Earlier this month, I tried out ungoogled-chromium,
which was available as a package at the time. I've
tried again today, and though the ports tree still
lists i386 as a valid platform, the different mirrors
I've tried do not pro
5 matches
Mail list logo
