Aren’t new version enabling (some.host) to not race ?
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:26 AM Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hey guys.
>
> Thanks for the ideas. Sadly I cannot use static IPs as we don’t control
> the domains.
>
> I think I’ll use Otto’s suggestion as I am already doing that to provide a
> black hol
Hey guys.
Thanks for the ideas. Sadly I cannot use static IPs as we don’t control the
domains.
I think I’ll use Otto’s suggestion as I am already doing that to provide a
black hole table for the spamhaus drop list. So I’ll just enhance that script
to manage some more tables 😀
After all, the c
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:14:19AM +0100, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is anyone else aware of the Unbound and PF race condition that exists when
> FQDNs are used in pf.conf with a local Unbound server?
Yes, it's an obvious one isn't it?
>
> The issue occurs when pf starts before unbound,
Hi guys,
Is anyone else aware of the Unbound and PF race condition that exists when
FQDNs are used in pf.conf with a local Unbound server?
The issue occurs when pf starts before unbound, but where pf fails to start as
it cannot resolve some DNS names.. and so unbound also fails to work when it
4 matches
Mail list logo
