On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:16:22 -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've got to say, I find the From rewrites less annoying than not
> scrubbing MIME parts, though I'd prefer if Reply-To was set (to
> list+sender, leaving any Mail-Followup-To in place). Many lists have
> done this (often for all senders
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:41 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2024-03-22, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > --3aa8dc06143b8cab
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:18=E2=80=AFAM Stuart Henderson
>
On 2024-03-22, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> --3aa8dc06143b8cab
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:18=E2=80=AFAM Stuart Henderson opper.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-03-21, Roderick wrote:
>> > --00
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:18 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2024-03-21, Roderick wrote:
> > --e4360006142cfd57
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Is it not ARC meant to be the solution for
> > this problem?
>
> That
On 2024-03-21, Roderick wrote:
> --e4360006142cfd57
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Is it not ARC meant to be the solution for
> this problem?
That was sort-of the idea, but it requires mail server admins to decide
which AR
Moin,
> Is it not ARC meant to be the solution for
> this problem?
Yeah, technically, ARC _should_ help with this. However, in practice,
trusting ARC is not really that common.
> Would DMARC then consider the original
> DKIM and SPF tests?
Kind of; DMARC would trust the signed ARC headers that e
Is it not ARC meant to be the solution for
this problem?
Would DMARC then consider the original
DKIM and SPF tests?
Todd C. Miller schrieb am Mi., 13. März 2024, 14:56:
> I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
> header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Mess
Moin,
> I am intentionally double-posting this email (once from my personal
> domain, once from reads-this-mailinglist.com) to see how well
> preserving messages as sent works/impacts deliverability.
Some results on this: For the mail from @reads-this-mailinglist.com all
DMARC reports indicated
Moin,
>
> I've disabled the From: rewriting for now after complaints that it
> makes things a lot less usable. We'll try preserving messages as
> sent instead, which means that text/html parts will now be passed
> through (sorry).
>
Darn, but i see where this can break the workflow of people.
I
Moin,
>
> I've disabled the From: rewriting for now after complaints that it
> makes things a lot less usable. We'll try preserving messages as
> sent instead, which means that text/html parts will now be passed
> through (sorry).
>
Darn, but i see where this can break the workflow of people.
I
I notice date an time of your reply. You are quite ridiculus all.
Hoping to find any "indipendent head" around OpenBSD or leave..
-Dan
Mar 15, 2024 17:13:52 Dan :
> Todd C. Miller :
>
>> I've disabled the From: rewriting
>
> Indeed it appeared too secure for OpenBSD...
Todd C. Miller :
> I've disabled the From: rewriting
Indeed it appeared too secure for OpenBSD...
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
> header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Messages from
> domains using DMARC will now have a From: header like:
>
> From: "John Connor via misc"
I want to thank you for the From rewriting.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:54:14 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
> header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Messages from
> domains using DMARC will now have a From: header like:
>
> From: "John Connor via misc"
>
> and t
Moin,
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 11:54 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
> header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Messages from
> domains using DMARC will now have a From: header like:
Awesome, thanks!
> I could relax this bu
On March 13, 2024 1:54:14 PM EDT, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
>I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
>header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Messages from
>domains using DMARC will now have a From: header like:
>
>From: "John Connor via misc"
>
>and the or
I've just added support to our majordomo for rewriting the From:
header when the sender's domain has a DMARC policy. Messages from
domains using DMARC will now have a From: header like:
From: "John Connor via misc"
and the original From: address is preserved in the X-Original-From:
header i
Moin,
as some more notifications started to stack up about bouncing messages
from various openbsd mailinglists (and my logs start to reach two digit
numbers over the past two weeks), i figured it might be good to send a
note about this:
The openbsd mailinglists break (for reasonable reasons) DKIM
18 matches
Mail list logo
