On 11:37:48 Nov 14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> failover trunks are quite good for this situation (depending on how
> long your switch takes to notice the move). Separate subnets are another
> option but means doing more (and losing active connections) when you
> change between wired and wireless.
;ll play with it some more. Thanks to all for the tips!
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Connectivity-Issues-with-Linksys-802.11-USB-Adapter-tf4802127.html#a13747739
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2007/11/14 16:44, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> > These are in the same subnet, this won't work. You might like
> > to look at trunk(4).
>
> Can't you bridge them or create separate subnets and route them?
>
> Is trunking the purpose here?
failover trunks are quite good for this situation (de
On 10:01:31 Nov 14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> These are in the same subnet, this won't work. You might like
> to look at trunk(4).
>
Can't you bridge them or create separate subnets and route them?
Is trunking the purpose here?
Just wondering
regards,
Girish
work. You might like
to look at trunk(4).
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Connectivity-Issues-with-Linksys-802.11-USB-Adapter-tf4802127.html#a13739799
Wow, a nabble post with sufficient information to spot the
problem, that is somewhat unusual :-)
ideas?
Thanks,
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Connectivity-Issues-with-Linksys-802.11-USB-Adapter-tf4802127.html#a13739799
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6 matches
Mail list logo
