Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-16 Thread Daniel Melameth
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:33 +, Daniel Melameth wrote: >> In playing around with the new CoDel/fair traffic sharing, it's not >> clear to me the best way to work with this when also using the >> previous queuing. > > It's not clear to m

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-16 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:24 +, Glenn Faustino wrote: > Thanks Mike! > > When I was using newqueue/hfsc I used to assign queues to certain traffic > like below: > > match inet proto tcp from any to any port ssh set queue (ssh_bulkq, > ssh_prioq) > match inet proto {tcp,udp} from any to any p

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-15 Thread Glenn Faustino
Thanks Mike! When I was using newqueue/hfsc I used to assign queues to certain traffic like below: match inet proto tcp from any to any port ssh set queue (ssh_bulkq, ssh_prioq) match inet proto {tcp,udp} from any to any port {domain,ntp} set queue (dnsq, ackq) match inet proto {tcp,udp} from any

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-15 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 02:51 +, Glenn Faustino wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I'm using HFSC with two root queues (1 for uplink and 1 for downlink), can > you please share your config for FQ-CoDel with HFSC with two queues if you > don't mind? > > Regards, > Glenn > I'm not certain which config you

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-13 Thread Glenn Faustino
Hi Mike, I'm using HFSC with two root queues (1 for uplink and 1 for downlink), can you please share your config for FQ-CoDel with HFSC with two queues if you don't mind? Regards, Glenn On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:33 +, Daniel Melam

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-13 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:33 +, Daniel Melameth wrote: > In playing around with the new CoDel/fair traffic sharing, it's not > clear to me the best way to work with this when also using the > previous queuing. It's not clear to me either at least not in the generic case :-) I guess it depends

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-13 Thread Daniel Melameth
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote: >> Also, the pf.conf man page says the default qlimit is 1024, but, if I >> don't specify a qlimit, pfctl –vsq shows a qlength of 50 when I was >> expecting it to be 1024. What am I missing? > > Why would you want to have a pool of 1024 oppo

Re: CoDel Flows

2017-10-12 Thread Daniel Ouellet
> Also, the pf.conf man page says the default qlimit is 1024, but, if I > don't specify a qlimit, pfctl –vsq shows a qlength of 50 when I was > expecting it to be 1024. What am I missing? Why would you want to have a pool of 1024 oppose to the default of 50 slots for your queue? You will increas

CoDel Flows

2017-10-12 Thread Daniel Melameth
In playing around with the new CoDel/fair traffic sharing, it's not clear to me the best way to work with this when also using the previous queuing. pfctl balks when I specify a flow on the root queue with child queues present, so I only specify flows on child queues. Will CoDel still work as expe