On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:28:39AM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-03-10, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> > Hello Raf,
> >
> > On Mon 09/03/2015 19:46, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> >> Using 'sudo' and your $UMASK != 022 by any chance?
> >
> > That was exactly the cause! I realized just yesterday n
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:33:55AM GMT, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Hello Raf,
Hi Alessandro,
> On Mon 09/03/2015 19:46, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Using 'sudo' and your $UMASK != 022 by any chance?
>
> That was exactly the cause! I realized just yesterday night that I
> forgot to add the umas
Hello Stuart,
On Tue 10/03/2015 08:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Is this while building the port, or just installing from packages?
Installing from packages. Isn't that expected?
--
Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
[mailto:just22@gmail.com]
LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/in/delaurenzis
On 2015-03-10, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Hello Raf,
>
> On Mon 09/03/2015 19:46, Raf Czlonka wrote:
>> Using 'sudo' and your $UMASK != 022 by any chance?
>
> That was exactly the cause! I realized just yesterday night that I
> forgot to add the umask_override option to the sudoers defaults.
Hello Raf,
On Mon 09/03/2015 19:46, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Using 'sudo' and your $UMASK != 022 by any chance?
That was exactly the cause! I realized just yesterday night that I
forgot to add the umask_override option to the sudoers defaults...
Really wise (and correct) guess, Raf!
--
Alessandro
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:56:05AM GMT, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Sun 08/03/2015 00:01, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >
> > Permissions are fine here.
> > Not sure why yours are not.
> >
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Actually, I re-installed the latest snapshot
> in a qem
Hi Antoine,
On Sun 08/03/2015 00:01, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> Permissions are fine here.
> Not sure why yours are not.
>
Thanks for your feedback. Actually, I re-installed the latest snapshot
in a qemu environment and added only cups (and its dependencies), just
to double check, and I can co
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 11:20:30PM +0100, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Sat 07/03/2015 21:32, Fred wrote:
> > Both Firefox and Chrome let me do https://localhost:631/ but then both
> > complain and I have to add exceptions, once added it works for me.
> >
> > In chrome the conn
On Sat 07/03/2015 23:20, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> After adding the exception, I continue to see the "Not Found" message.
> So the encryption was not the root cause.
>
> But it seems I've sorted it out: the files used for CUPS's web interface
> are contained into the /usr/local/share/doc/cu
Hi Fred,
On Sat 07/03/2015 21:32, Fred wrote:
> Both Firefox and Chrome let me do https://localhost:631/ but then both
> complain and I have to add exceptions, once added it works for me.
>
> In chrome the connection is then encrypted with TLS 1.2
>
> port:fred ~> uname -a; dmesg|head -4; pkg_in
On 03/07/15 17:41, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Dear misc@ readers,
I must admit, I do not have a lot of luck with CUPS...
This time, I'm not even able to connect to the web interface!
Brand new snapshot installation:
just22@poseidon:[~]> uname -a
OpenBSD poseidon.atlantide.net 5.7 GENERIC.
On 03/07/2015 09:41 AM, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> CUPS daemon is up and running, but when I try to access to
> https://localhost:631, there seems to be troubles with the SSL
> encryption; in lynx, for example:
Mine does not use https, since it is limited to localhost only. I don't
remember
Dear misc@ readers,
I must admit, I do not have a lot of luck with CUPS...
This time, I'm not even able to connect to the web interface!
Brand new snapshot installation:
just22@poseidon:[~]> uname -a
OpenBSD poseidon.atlantide.net 5.7 GENERIC.MP#875 amd64
CUPS daemon is up and running, but whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
