On 2016 Oct 04 (Tue) at 09:27:50 +0200 (+0200), Jasper Siepkes wrote:
:Hi list!
:
:I'm experimenting with CARP and I'm a bit puzzled by the following
:behavior; I have 2 hosts setup in an active/passive way with CARP.
:Host A has an advskew of 0 and becomes master, Host B has an
:advskew of 100 an
Silly me... I forgot the 'net.inet.carp.preempt' sysctl variable.
I thought it was only for forcing demotion of other CARP interfaces if a
single one failed. But it's also for "claiming" the master spot.
Sorry for the noise :-(
> Op 4 oktober 2016 om 9:27 schreef Jasper Siepkes :
>
> Hi list!
Hi list!
I'm experimenting with CARP and I'm a bit puzzled by the following
behavior; I have 2 hosts setup in an active/passive way with CARP.
Host A has an advskew of 0 and becomes master, Host B has an
advskew of 100 and becomes backup. Now when host A fails host B becomes
master just like i wo
3 matches
Mail list logo