Re: Bridge wireless and wired networks.

2006-07-09 Thread Jan Johansson
kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan Johansson skrev: > >kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of > >>the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself. > >> > >>but you don't say exactly where you

Re: Bridge wireless and wired networks.

2006-07-05 Thread kami petersen
Jan Johansson skrev: kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself. but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful... It works, I just thought there might

Re: Bridge wireless and wired networks.

2006-07-05 Thread Jan Johansson
kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of > the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself. > > but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful... It works, I just thought there might be a cleaner solut

Re: Bridge wireless and wired networks.

2006-07-05 Thread kami petersen
Jan Johansson skrev: Hello. On my laptop I use trunk(4) failover to switch between wired and wireless networks. It works great. But I think my solution for the "router" is a bit dirty. Is there a better way? The "router" has one interface connected to the internet (fxp0) and two interfaces for

Bridge wireless and wired networks.

2006-07-05 Thread Jan Johansson
Hello. On my laptop I use trunk(4) failover to switch between wired and wireless networks. It works great. But I think my solution for the "router" is a bit dirty. Is there a better way? The "router" has one interface connected to the internet (fxp0) and two interfaces for the internal network (r