On 2007/06/06 14:32, BradenM - Sonoma Computer wrote:
...pretty useful info...
Also useful for any suspected PF problems:
# pfctl -sa
(to check that the ruleset did indeed get loaded, and that PF is
enabled - if you can also have some pings running we'll see how
state tables look too).
# sysctl
Matt Rowley wrote:
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:50:bf:3a:2e:66
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet 64.142.102.8 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 64.142.102.255
inet6 fe80::250:bfff:fe3a:2e66%rl0 prefixle
> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>lladdr 00:50:bf:3a:2e:66
>groups: egress
>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
>status: active
>inet 64.142.102.8 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 64.142.102.255
>inet6 fe80::250:bfff:fe3a:2e66%rl0 prefixlen 64 sc
# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:50:bf:3a:2e:66
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autoselect (100base
On 6/5/07, Bray Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Misc Users;
I'm having NAT problems; could someone examine my pf file and make some
recommendations?
This is really incomplete. What are you trying to accomplish? What
works and what doesn't? What are the interfaces for your internal,
dmz
> I'm having NAT problems; could someone examine my pf file and make some
> recommendations?
> (Yes, Nat is well documented. I'm not here because of issues with clarity.
> Thanks;
Well, for starters, you have three 'nat' statements that you probably meant
to be 'binat' statements.
> #NAT and Bin
Misc Users;
I'm having NAT problems; could someone examine my pf file and make some
recommendations?
(Yes, Nat is well documented. I'm not here because of issues with clarity.
Thanks;
Bray.
PS: My pf.conf file
#Macros
# 192.168.0.1 subnet
ext_ip="64.142.102.8"
int_ip="192.168.0.1"
int_blo
7 matches
Mail list logo
