bofh wrote:
> The reasons I've are:
>
> Need to support commercial packages
> Linux is more mainstream
> Debian has a maintenance program in place (ie, security patches are
> back ported to supported platforms)
> Longetivity of a particular level of release
...
I've used Debian a bit since 1997.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:10:54PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Where I work right now, we have bsd and debian on servers.
> > All user computers run debian or mandrake right now (and
> > we're going to move those to debian). We dont let them choose.
> > It is mandatory. We use bsd and some
The reasons I've are:
Need to support commercial packages
Linux is more mainstream
Debian has a maintenance program in place (ie, security patches are
back ported to supported platforms)
Longetivity of a particular level of release
And... Hell of a lot of "opensource" programmers think cross-plat
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:36:21AM +, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
Where I work right now, we have bsd and debian on servers.
All user computers run debian or mandrake right now (and
we're going to move those to debian). We dont let them choose.
It
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:36:21AM +, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> Where I work right now, we have bsd and debian on servers.
> All user computers run debian or mandrake right now (and
> we're going to move those to debian). We dont let them choose.
> It is mandatory. We use bsd and some debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
