I was just thinking today about how cool it would be to have an OpenBSD
phone, and then I saw your post. How bizarre. Anyway, the closest thing I
have found to a "pocket computer phone" is the android line of phones. I've
had an original Droid, and now I have a Droid Incredible, and I absolutely
lo
On 17/11/10 12:59, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
>> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>>
>> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
>> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB stora
On 11/21/2010 3:55 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Oh my god, yes, virtual machines are so safe.
Huh? I was replying to Marco's statement that
>>> [Android] is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read
>>> your email, credit card numbers, etc etc.
Which seemed to imply that Android has buil
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> Android and Maemo are Linux-based. B Symbian, iOS, Bada, Blackberry
> and Windows Mobile are not.
Bada is typically linux-based, while Bada implementation inSamsung
Wave S8500 isn't. Actually it contains code from BSD flavour
(http:/
> > It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
> > credit card numbers, etc etc.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> >> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
> >> have to say I like it a lot. But it is defin
On 11/17/2010 7:28 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
> credit card numbers, etc etc.
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
>> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
>> have to sa
hmm, on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:51:00PM -0600, Marko Kraljevic said that
> The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can
http://wiki.geeksphone.com/en/index.php?title=Main_Page
-f
--
go and catch a falling star...
You're looking at this from a programmer's perspective and not from a
business one.
let's look at the basic Unix-like/descended systems: All were developed
because each founder- or founders- saw a niche, necessity, or challenge.
Nokia, Google, and Apple are business entities whose purpose is to c
It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
credit card numbers, etc etc.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
> have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
> po
On 18/11/2010, at 10:15 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :
Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.
And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.
Best
Martin
... And is a fraudster and a criminal
paulm
Il 17/11/10 23.51, Marko Kraljevic ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
[snap]
The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can
run full blown Debian, AFAIK. Never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on
one, but perhaps it is possible? I'm assuming i
Il 18/11/10 00.53, m brandenberg ha scritto:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Jona Joachim wrote:
The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Moko port is dead.
Just don't buy it ;)
That said, I have a Neo 1973 available for a deal if anyone wants
to play...
Dont even try to donate to the community!
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Jona Joachim wrote:
The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Moko port is dead.
Just don't buy it ;)
That said, I have a Neo 1973 available for a deal if anyone wants
to play...
--
Monty Brandenberg
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:51:00 -0600
Marko Kraljevic wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> > most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
> >
> > Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> > a
2010/11/17 Jona Joachim :
> On 2010-11-17, Martin Schr?der wrote:
>> And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.
>
> Obvious troll is obvious.
Ask Theo about Mr. Vandeputte. :-)
Oh, and if you believe http://accounting.kd85.com/ , read the list
archives.
Best
Martin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> wifi
On 2010-11-17, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :
>> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
>> obsolete.
>
> And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.
Obvious troll is obvious.
--
Worse is better
Richard P. Gabriel
On 2010-11-17, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.
On top of that graphics and wifi documentation is only available under
NDA and the reverse engineered Linux drivers are broken.
The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Mok
2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.
And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.
Best
Martin
Jan Stary wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
The most open smartphone I'm aware o
The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
possible.
2010/11/17 patric conant :
> Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here.
>
> On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero" wrote:
>
> I
Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here.
On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero" wrote:
Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
>
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.
I Agree. It's really really obsolete.
>
Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.
I Agree. It's really really obsolete.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?
On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrot
Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?
>
> On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrote:
>> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
>> most probably with
may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?
On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB sto
Use duct tape and wire it with a netbook with internal GSM module around
your head and install vanilla OpenBSD... works perfectly
Don't use that new thing called 3g, umts,cdma or anything else. It's alien
technology
Den 2010 11 17 09:05 skrev "Jan Stary" :
My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
to ins
27 matches
Mail list logo
