On 6/11/05, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mdff wrote:
> > our favourite was/is HP's DLxxx series, but mickey@ is
> > working on the ciss-port for their storage controllers and
> > we don't know when it's stable for production use...
>
> I usually wind up using older Compaq and HP ser
mdff wrote:
our favourite was/is HP's DLxxx series, but mickey@ is
working on the ciss-port for their storage controllers and
we don't know when it's stable for production use...
I usually wind up using older Compaq and HP servers for OpenBSD, where
they used either Megaraid, old Adaptec or Sm
mdff said:
> hi misc@,
>
> which hardware r u talking about for example? we'd like
> to use such "real" servers, but we can't decide what vendor
> to choose. we definitely do not want to "build" our own
> server (taking the raid controller from vendor x and the
> disks from vendor y, having an over
On 6/10/05, mdff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Steve Shockley writes:
>> Avoid relying on cheap hardware to make your cost point.
>> OpenBSD runs well on "real", modern servers.
>
> any experience values which vendor to choose servers from?
> and of course, where the newer hardware is fully supp
Hi Steve,
I was happy to get your comments and was not offended by anything you
said. I'm very happy to learn from anyone, especially if it is going
to improve the presentation. You made some good points that I will use
going forward :) My objective is really to prove by example & experience
t
hi misc@,
which hardware r u talking about for example? we'd like
to use such "real" servers, but we can't decide what vendor
to choose. we definitely do not want to "build" our own
server (taking the raid controller from vendor x and the
disks from vendor y, having an overkill xeon mabo from z
an
On Mon, June 6, 2005 9:48 am, Mark Uemura wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to provide me with your feedback. I'm not
> adverse to getting or taking criticism if I'm wrong and/or if I learn
> something. As my very close father-like friend says to me, "Mark, if
> you're not careful, you'll learn
Mark Uemura wrote:
six month prior to
me taking over the SysAdmin position.
Ah, see when I read the slides, I got the impression that you came in as
a consultant to do all this, not that you did it all in-house.
I for one have problems putting a Windows Server on the Internet. Even
within
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Ray Percival wrote:
> >To start with http://www.schneier.com/pptp.html and also because I for
> >one don't trust *any* security related code that I can't get the source
> >for. I think I'm not alone here by any means.
>
> You're talk
> (Besides, isn't it "less talk, more code"? Of course I'm probably
> better at talking than coding.)
Actually, I don't know why, but people keep getting the sentence wrong,
for no good reason.
The real sentence is ``less talk, more cheese''.
Note that, I have a list if you somehow can't find
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Lots of commentary from you, Steve... is that why you are the one giving
the talks?
I'm not sure I have anyone to give a talk to, and I haven't done
anything quite as interesting (or large-scale) as this with OpenBSD.
(Besides, isn't it "less talk, more code"? Of course
Ray Percival wrote:
To start with http://www.schneier.com/pptp.html and also because I for
one don't trust *any* security related code that I can't get the source
for. I think I'm not alone here by any means.
You're talking about PPTP, I'm talking about IPsec.
Fact of the matter is we can loo
> This is a Very Nicely Done Presentation!
>
> Dave Feustel
Hi Dave,
Thanks a lot for this.
I'm glad that people like it because it was a lot
of work to put it together. More so than building
and configuring systems ;)
Actually, I did get a lot of help along the way and
Ryan McBride who was
Hi Steve,
Thanks for taking the time to provide me with your feedback. I'm not
adverse to getting or taking criticism if I'm wrong and/or if I learn
something. As my very close father-like friend says to me, "Mark,
if you're not careful, you'll learn something everyday!" :)
> Overall the prese
On Sunday 05 June 2005 06:12 pm, Mark Uemura wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently gave a talk that may interest some. I hope
> that it could be used by anyone presenting the merits
> of OpenBSD and related Projects as a business case for
> the corporate world. The slides can be used by anyone
> in an
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:25:39PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Mark Uemura wrote:
> Remote access: Windows' built-in Remote Desktop is included with the OS,
> you don't need OpenBSD for that. You couldn't do that over your Intel
> VPN? Remote Desktop is potentially vulnerable to MITM, but it's
Lots of commentary from you, Steve... is that why you are the one giving
the talks?
>Mark Uemura wrote:
>> I hope this helps others put forth a good case for
>> OpenBSD in their working environment.
>
>Overall the presentation is well-done, but I take some exception with
>some of your conclusions
Mark Uemura wrote:
I hope this helps others put forth a good case for
OpenBSD in their working environment.
Overall the presentation is well-done, but I take some exception with
some of your conclusions on slide 34. I know when I talk to a vendor
and get unrealistic comparisons, mentally tha
Hi All,
I recently gave a talk that may interest some. I hope
that it could be used by anyone presenting the merits
of OpenBSD and related Projects as a business case for
the corporate world. The slides can be used by anyone
in any manner that would best benefit the Project.
I've updated our co
19 matches
Mail list logo
