Dries Schellekens wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=111690466011478&w=2
How does this compare to NetBSD agr(4)? Is this also IEEE 802.3AD?
It does some things that agr does not, but doesn't do 802.3ad yet.
Probably soon though.
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Razmus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: NIC bonding/trunking/802.3ad
> But this requires cooperation on the part of the switch. The original
> poster mentioned connecting to two distinct
Niall O'Higgins wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:01:23PM +0100, Hyb wrote:
It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
every so often, but is often disregarded on the basis that gigE is now
cheap. I se
Niall O'Higgins wrote:
speak of the devil! reyk@ got there already ...
Wow, is there nothing reyk@ can't do?
* Niall O'Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050524 11:10]:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:01:23PM +0100, Hyb wrote:
> > It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
> > aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
> > every so often, but i
- Original Message -
From: "Niall O'Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hyb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: NIC bonding/trunking/802.3ad
> speak of the devil! reyk@ got there already ...
>
>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:01:23PM +0100, Hyb wrote:
> It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
> aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
> every so often, but is often disregarded on the basis that gigE is now
> cheap. I see the redudancy as
Hi list,
It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
every so often, but is often disregarded on the basis that gigE is now
cheap. I see the redudancy as a much more valuable asset though.
We have been recently
Kory Talmage wrote:
This is kinda off topic, but does anyone know if Openbsd has support
for 802.3ad (ethernet trunking). I recently found out that NetBSD now
officially supports 802.3ad, it would be nice if Openbsd did as well
since a dedicated pf box can benefit from this :-).
Not yet
9 matches
Mail list logo
