On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:03:28PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-07-18, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:16:00PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
> >> For many years, I have reliably used read-only partitions for /usr and
> >> /usr/local. -current sysmerge breaks that ass
On 2014-07-18, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:16:00PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
>> For many years, I have reliably used read-only partitions for /usr and
>> /usr/local. -current sysmerge breaks that assumption.
>
> I don't think we ever officially supported a RO /usr...
the
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:16:00PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
> For many years, I have reliably used read-only partitions for /usr and
> /usr/local. -current sysmerge breaks that assumption.
I don't think we ever officially supported a RO /usr...
> i7v64:OpenBSD/sysmerge 980>CMD="env PAGER=cat sy
For many years, I have reliably used read-only partitions for /usr and
/usr/local. -current sysmerge breaks that assumption.
i7v64:OpenBSD/sysmerge 980>CMD="env PAGER=cat sysmerge -b -s ${ETC_TGZ} -x
${XETC_TGZ}"
i7v64:OpenBSD/sysmerge 981>sudo $CMD
===> Fetching file:///nas2/public/OpenBSD/sna
4 matches
Mail list logo