Arrived yesterday to me in Brazil, Rio...
2014-10-30 22:01 GMT-02:00 Fish Kungfu :
> 5.6 CD's arrived today in Greenville, South Carolina!
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Carlin Bingham wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
> > > On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff
5.6 CD's arrived today in Greenville, South Carolina!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Carlin Bingham wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
> > On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
> > > Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
> > Arrived today in Tauranga, New
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
> On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
> > Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
> Arrived today in Tauranga, New Zealand.
>
Arrived today in the other half of New Zealand (Chistchurch).
--
Carlin
On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
Arrived today in Tauranga, New Zealand.
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
As always, special thanks to all the developers for yet another
consistent and straight on schedule release.
I'd just like to add that for the past year (at least) it has been
amazing to watch the project take some big (and some not so big steps)
On 10/29/14 18:04, ian kremlin wrote:
> 5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
It arrived yesterday in Schweinfurt, Germany. This time the seal was
not broken :-).
-peter
> Hopefully you agree that the file name "snapshots/amd64/install56.iso"
> is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
> kind of upgrade path from the "install56.iso" snapshot to the 5.6 release.
> My mistake.
As I understand it, the releases do not necessarily corre
5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>Hopefully you agree that the file name "snapshots/amd64/install56.iso"
>>is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is
>Hopefully you agree that the file name "snapshots/amd64/install56.iso"
>is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
>kind of upgrade path from the "install56.iso" snapshot to the 5.6 release.
>My mistake.
It is not misleading in any way.
Those two digits are looked
Harald Dunkel wrote
>Hopefully you agree that the file name "snapshots/amd64/install56.iso"
>is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
>kind of upgrade path from the "install56.iso" snapshot to the 5.6 release.
Who is being misled?
(from an outsider)
The overriding
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:54:26PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 10/28/14 14:23, Oliver Peter wrote:
> >
> > If the difference between release and snapshot is too confusing for
> > you, you should probably just stay with release. If you need releases
> > on time you should orde
Hi Oliver,
On 10/28/14 14:23, Oliver Peter wrote:
>
> If the difference between release and snapshot is too confusing for
> you, you should probably just stay with release. If you need releases
> on time you should order a CD set next time.
>
Of course I understand that there is a difference b
trondd said:
> And as Theo brought up, numbering them 57 snapshots doesn't fix anything.
> It just changes the confusion. Instead of you asking if the 56 snapshot
> was close to the 56 release version, we'd have someone asking if the 57
> snapshot they see is close to the 57 release that won't be
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:13:51PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
> >> the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
> >
> > From the ftp site:
> >
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 587411
As a release engineer, the numbering convention of the snapshots does seem
confusing to me at first. But if it works for the project, that's what's
important.
And as Theo brought up, numbering them 57 snapshots doesn't fix anything.
It just changes the confusion. Instead of you asking if the 56
Theo de Raadt said:
> Oh, you want us to call the snapshots 57, instead?
>
> How will that enligthen people?
FWIW naming snapshots after release they lead to is more helpful then
naming them after previous release that does not include some of their
code.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
>On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> Major differences.
>>
>> The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
>> hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
>> not yet commited.
>>
>
>If I got you correctly the current "install56.iso" fro
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > Major differences.
> >
> > The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
> > hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
> > not yet
On 10/28/14 09:02, Richard Toohey wrote:
> You get your asbestos pants on, and I'll get myself some popcorn.
>
I didn't mean any offense.
Thanx for the heads-up
Harri
On 10/28/14 20:52, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I would suggest to increase the version information in the
snapshot file names as soon as the release tag is attached and
the -stable branch is created. This could help to avoid a lot
of confusion.
You get your asbestos pants on, and I'll get myself som
On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Major differences.
>
> The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
> hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
> not yet commited.
>
If I got you correctly the current "install56.iso" from the
snap
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
> OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
Arrived north of Chicago IL, USA on 27 Oct 2014
On new website looked at shipping address during order and realized a
couple things needed to be rearranged to make things l
>On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
>>> the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
>>
>> From the ftp site:
>>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
>>
>> That is around 11 hours ago. Prob
On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
>> the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
>
> From the ftp site:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
>
> That is around 11 hours ago. Probably a bi
>How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
>the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
>From the ftp site:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
That is around 11 hours ago. Probably a bit newer than what people
will find on their CDs.
Hi folks,
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
Regards
Harri
>sl...@troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt), 2014.10.24 (Fri) 17:41 (CEST):
>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
>> Maurice McCarthy wrote:
>>
>> > OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
>> >
>>
>> So does this mean I should download
sl...@troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt), 2014.10.24 (Fri) 17:41 (CEST):
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
> Maurice McCarthy wrote:
>
> > OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
> >
>
> So does this mean I should download and install 5.6 to power m
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
Maurice McCarthy wrote:
> OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
>
So does this mean I should download and install 5.6 to power my
OpenBSD/pf firewall/NAT/router?
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshoote
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
30 matches
Mail list logo
