On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:55:52PM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-15 01:59]:
> >> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > * Toni Mueller <
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-15 01:59]:
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-14 11:29]:
>> >> Would it be possible to
* David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-15 01:59]:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-14 11:29]:
> >> Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
> >> table, or would the continuo
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-14 11:29]:
>> Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
>> table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead
>> to a corrupted
* Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-14 11:29]:
> Would it be possible to walk along the live table, without copying the
> table, or would the continuous stream of route inserts and deletes lead
> to a corrupted view and/or access to the wrong parts of the system's
> memory (which must to be
Hi,
On Sat, 14.06.2008 at 01:39:29 +0200, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will
> need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as
> real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgp
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Nope. That is not the problem. The main issues is that a full view will
> need a lot of memory for the sysctl. This memory needs to be available as
> real memory because it is wired into the kernel. If you run bgpd with
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 04:20:45PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
> > my machines:
> >
> > # netstat -rnf inet
> > netstat: sysctl of routing table: C
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
> my machines:
>
> # netstat -rnf inet
> netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
"netstat -r" dumps the routing table by calling sysctl
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
> my machines:
>
> # netstat -rnf inet
> netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
>
> This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes
Hi,
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each.
Any idea about how to combat this, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
11 matches
Mail list logo
