Hello again,
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:08:16 -0800 sombody wrote:
> Looks like something is misinterpreting ID numbers form the EEPROM on
> the memory modules. But I'd like to see what is physically there
> before making a call on what is going wrong, if you have any photos
> of the system's motherb
On 2016-12-01 22:01, Aaron Mason wrote:
I've got two Sun Netra X1s (400MHz ultraSPARC IIe, 2GB RAM, 2x40GB
drives) with 5.9 installed, they crash after awhile but I suspect
that's a cooling issue since these things run pretty hot. I'd use
them as firewalls but I can't push any more than ~50Mbps
I've got two Sun Netra X1s (400MHz ultraSPARC IIe, 2GB RAM, 2x40GB
drives) with 5.9 installed, they crash after awhile but I suspect
that's a cooling issue since these things run pretty hot. I'd use
them as firewalls but I can't push any more than ~50Mbps through them
and I've got a 100/40 fibre c
On a similar note, I have a Sun E6K (circa 1996, 30x 400Mhz CPU's 30GB
of RAM) running 6.0 like a dream, with some minor patches to support
more than 8 disks in softraid 5.
Could just be some garbage IBM machines of that era would spit out to
confuse anything not-Winders, as part of an agreement with Microshart.
Might pull out an old machine, give it some NICs and make it a
firewall. Got an old Lacie 1U storage appliance with a VIA C7 mobo,
just needs an additional
Craig Skinner wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:09:13 +0100 butresin wrote:
On 16.11.29Tue 14:12, Craig Skinner wrote:
real mem = 200740864 (191MB)
avail mem = 184385536 (175MB)
...
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 64MB SDRAM non-parity PC100CL3
spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x51: 64MB SDRAM non-parity P
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:09:13 +0100 butresin wrote:
> On 16.11.29Tue 14:12, Craig Skinner wrote:
> >
> > real mem = 200740864 (191MB)
> > avail mem = 184385536 (175MB)
> ...
> > spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 64MB SDRAM non-parity PC100CL3
> > spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x51: 64MB SDRAM non-parity PC10
si0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Cordialement,
Pierre BARDOU
-Message d'origine-----
De : KAWAMATA Yoshihiro [mailto:k...@on.rim.or.jp]
Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2016 02:33
À : misc@openbsd.org
Cc : dm...@openbsd.org; skin...@britvault.co.uk
On 16.11.29Tue 14:12, Craig Skinner wrote:
>
> real mem = 200740864 (191MB)
> avail mem = 184385536 (175MB)
...
> spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 64MB SDRAM non-parity PC100CL3
> spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x51: 64MB SDRAM non-parity PC100CL3
> spdmem2 at iic0 addr 0x52: 64MB SDRAM ECC PC100CL2
> spdmem3 at
From: skin...@britvault.co.uk (Craig Skinner)
Subject: 350MHz IBM Intel Pentium II runs 5.9 fine
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:12:22 +
> Runs fine for me 24*7, for about 15 years. OpenBSD is SUPERB!
>
> 5.7 dumped & 5.9 installed on 22nd October:
Running about 24 * 365 * 15 is g
awesome, congrats
On 11/29/2016 12:12 PM, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Runs fine for me 24*7, for about 15 years. OpenBSD is SUPERB!
>
> 5.7 dumped & 5.9 installed on 22nd October:
>
> OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC) #1561: Fri Feb 26 01:22:37 MST 2016
> dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile
Runs fine for me 24*7, for about 15 years. OpenBSD is SUPERB!
5.7 dumped & 5.9 installed on 22nd October:
OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC) #1561: Fri Feb 26 01:22:37 MST 2016
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium II ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache)
12 matches
Mail list logo
