Pedro Martelletto wrote:
I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes
since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled "NKMEMPAGES_MAX"
and "maxusers", both with the i386 and the amd64 machines.
But consider that this happened only 7 and 10 days ago...
It has
> I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes
> since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled "NKMEMPAGES_MAX"
> and "maxusers", both with the i386 and the amd64 machines.
>
> But consider that this happened only 7 and 10 days ago...
It has been approximately
2006/7/31, diego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pedro, since I set the "option NKMEMPAGES_MAX=65535" on kernel file, the
server doesn't freeze
UVM amap128305 10153K 50705K157284K4071891000 0
16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536
This server has an uptime 12 days, before
ve 3 or 4
days
regards,.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Martelletto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Federico Giannici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: 3.9 freeze
Any news on this?
-p.
Federico Giannici wrote:
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Any news on this?
I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes
since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled "NKMEMPAGES_MAX"
and "maxusers", both with the i386 and the amd64 machines.
But consider that th
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Any news on this?
I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes
since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled "NKMEMPAGES_MAX"
and "maxusers", both with the i386 and the amd64 machines.
But consider that this happened only 7 and 10
Any news on this?
-p.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:07:16PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> It seems to me that under amd64 the "UVM Amap" usage is much higher then
> under i386. So, even if by default the limit is the double of the i386,
> it seems not enough.
That's probably because the code allocates in multiples o
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Federico,
Your diagnosis is correct, that freeze can be the result of reaching the
limit for UVM amap allocations. These get used by the kernel to describe
anonymous memory mappings, and mmap malloc() puts the UVM subsystem
under a higher load of those, eventually reachi
From: "Federico Giannici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pedro Martelletto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "mickey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: 3.9 freeze
Pedro Martel
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I'm not sure of what variables to set and where.
options(4) should tell you that.
-p.
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Federico,
Your diagnosis is correct, that freeze can be the result of reaching the
limit for UVM amap allocations. These get used by the kernel to describe
anonymous memory mappings, and mmap malloc() puts the UVM subsystem
under a higher load of those, eventually reachi
Federico,
Your diagnosis is correct, that freeze can be the result of reaching the
limit for UVM amap allocations. These get used by the kernel to describe
anonymous memory mappings, and mmap malloc() puts the UVM subsystem
under a higher load of those, eventually reaching the limit. Until an
appr
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:39:40PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I have noticed that the above "UVM amap" HighUse value is equal to the
> Limit value.
Indeed it looks suspicious. Not my area, though, so I'd have to look at
the code to know the exact consequences. But yes, it's a possibility.
diego wrote:
UVM amap201783 39322K 39322K 39322K12379757100 0
16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536
I have noticed that the above "UVM amap" HighUse value is equal to the
Limit value.
As I have already said, the PC of mine that occasional freezes has high
The next time it freezes, break into ddb and get the output of 'show
uvmexp'.
-p.
use 14564K, total allocated 32736K; utilization 44.5%
thanks...
diego,.
- Original Message -
From: "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Pedro Martelletto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:19
ok, I have the server on datacenter, when freeze I will try it.
- Original Message -
From: "mickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Pedro Martelletto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:52 AM
Su
no...
- Original Message -
From: "vladas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: 3.9 freeze
On 03/07/06, diego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, I can only ping the server or chang
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:34 AM
> Subject: Re: 3.9 freeze
>
>
> >Can you break into ddb?
> >
> >-p.
>
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
no, I can only ping the server or change tty (ctrl alt fn), but I can't type
anything.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Martelletto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: 3.9 freeze
Can you break into ddb?
-p.
Can you break into ddb?
-p.
Hi all, I have problems with 3.9, sometimes I recived "/bsd:
uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries" without panics, but the last
time after 4 thar message the server freeze.
Yesterday server freeze again without any message, I can't connect to the
server, but ping respond.
It's run apache,
23 matches
Mail list logo
