Re: 3.8-STABLE :cvs/XF4 seems to be broken.

2006-02-13 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:33:24 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Can anyone confirm or deny if XF4-STABLE is broken? I've updated source >twice and have had two failed builds of X while following FAQ5. > >Thanks, >JCR sorry for the noise -the problem was my own darn fault. I somehow

Re: 3.8-STABLE :cvs/XF4 seems to be broken.

2006-02-13 Thread kami petersen
J.C. Roberts skrev: Can anyone confirm or deny if XF4-STABLE is broken? I've updated source twice and have had two failed builds of X while following FAQ5. can you confirm that you actually have XF4-STABLE? a *clean* checkout usually cures a non-compiling tree. /kami

3.8-STABLE :cvs/XF4 seems to be broken.

2006-02-12 Thread J.C. Roberts
Can anyone confirm or deny if XF4-STABLE is broken? I've updated source twice and have had two failed builds of X while following FAQ5. Thanks, JCR