Re: 10baseT non-functional for gem

2010-09-14 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
Dale Rahn wrote: > Some apple machines have two different phys. Multiple phy support does not > exist on OpenBSD > mostly since it has nearly never been seen except for Apple systems. > The second phy is ignored on these systems. Okay, good to know. Thanks for the clarification. --Kurt

Re: 10baseT non-functional for gem

2010-09-14 Thread Dale Rahn
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:45:23PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > Miod Vallat wrote: > >> G4 powermac (dmesg below) which has 4.7 (although it looks like the > >> drivers in this case haven't changed). > > > gem(4) media support is limited by the PHY it is connected to. Your > > machine has a par

Re: 10baseT non-functional for gem

2010-09-14 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
Miod Vallat wrote: >> G4 powermac (dmesg below) which has 4.7 (although it looks like the >> drivers in this case haven't changed). > gem(4) media support is limited by the PHY it is connected to. Your > machine has a particular brgphy(4) model which can only do 100Mb/s and > 1Gb/s. > I have a ge

Re: 10baseT non-functional for gem

2010-09-13 Thread Miod Vallat
> G4 powermac (dmesg below) which has 4.7 (although it looks like the > drivers in this case haven't changed). > > Short version: > The gem manpage claims 10Mbit half-duplex (or full, but I didn't try > that), but it clearly does not. Why? No idea. I've done some cursory > looking through the f

10baseT non-functional for gem

2010-09-13 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
G4 powermac (dmesg below) which has 4.7 (although it looks like the drivers in this case haven't changed). Short version: The gem manpage claims 10Mbit half-duplex (or full, but I didn't try that), but it clearly does not. Why? No idea. I've done some cursory looking through the files for gem a