* noah pugsley [2013-09-13 09:12]:
> Gosh darn you Henning and your gigantic bavarian slides! Gosh darn you to
> heck.
I'm not barb... erm, bavarian.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
If you queue your http traffic, downloading those pics are not that bad on
the links. ;)
2013/9/13 noah pugsley
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Henning Brauer >wrote:
>
> > * Andy [2013-09-02 15:55]:
> > > Also I'm very willing to beta test the new ALTQ code? I was chatting
> > > to Theo
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Andy [2013-09-02 15:55]:
> > Also I'm very willing to beta test the new ALTQ code? I was chatting
> > to Theo briefly a few weeks back and he said I should ask for the
> > code but I cannot remember who in the team he said I should messa
* Andy [2013-09-02 15:55]:
> Also I'm very willing to beta test the new ALTQ code? I was chatting
> to Theo briefly a few weeks back and he said I should ask for the
> code but I cannot remember who in the team he said I should message
> for this?
c'est moi.
diff at http://bulabula.org/diffs/newq
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 15:19:07 +0200, Janne Johansson
wrote:
> Our ospfd boxes didn't like having PF on during failovers, while having
> ospf redundancy upwards and carp redundancy downwards, since PF normally
> doesn't like when it can't see the whole flow. Perhaps doing
sloppy-states
> could have "
Might have been PF reassemble that had issues with fragments coming in to
different hosts, where at least one of the active PFs would be waiting
forever for the missing pieces to arrive also. The solution was to not PF
on routers anyhow, and that is good separation of duties in any case.
2013/9/
Our ospfd boxes didn't like having PF on during failovers, while having
ospf redundancy upwards and carp redundancy downwards, since PF normally
doesn't like when it can't see the whole flow. Perhaps doing sloppy-states
could have "fixed" it, perhaps no-state could have done it, but in the end,
we
On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:56:46 -0400, John Jasen
wrote:
> Please forgive the top posting.
>
> If you have enough systems, can you hit the performance goals with carp
> and active load balancing?
>
I did think about that but these boxes will also be running OpenOSPFd and
OpenBGPd (will be our WAN
Please forgive the top posting.
If you have enough systems, can you hit the performance goals with carp
and active load balancing?
On 09/02/2013 09:53 AM, Andy wrote:
> If only you could 'buy' more time or make days longer.. ;)
>
> Because I know the OpenBSD developers are working hard on this
If only you could 'buy' more time or make days longer.. ;)
Because I know the OpenBSD developers are working hard on this and take
it very seriously, we have decided that we are going to continue to use
OpenBSD for these new 10G firewalls because the initial load is only
going to be around 500
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:41:58PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Le 02/09/2013 13:21, Mike Belopuhov a ?crit :
> > We are trying to address problems with MP networking right now,
> > but due to the lack of manpower the progress is slow.
> >
>
> What would you need to accelerate ? De
Hi Mike,
Le 02/09/2013 13:21, Mike Belopuhov a écrit :
> We are trying to address problems with MP networking right now,
> but due to the lack of manpower the progress is slow.
>
What would you need to accelerate ? Developpers, testers, time, money,
hardware, something else ?
Denis
On 2 September 2013 12:26, Andy wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I know this gets discussed a lot and I don't want to re-tread old
> ground, but I am in the process of specifying firewall hardware for
> 10Gbit and would like to check the rules-of-thumb I am using..
>
> We would like to reach 1 Million pp
Hi everyone,
I know this gets discussed a lot and I don't want to re-tread old
ground, but I am in the process of specifying firewall hardware for
10Gbit and would like to check the rules-of-thumb I am using..
We would like to reach 1 Million pps, and would like to forward at least
up-to the c
14 matches
Mail list logo
