On 06/21/10 15:05, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> Maybe I'm just being dense, but HOW can you patch a system without
> "building from source"?
>
> ... unless you have binary patches for all the architectures
> and that gets much more complicated if you have combinations of patches
> ...
The difference i
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Tony Berth wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200:
>
> > but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't
> want!
> > I just want to patch an existing system!
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
>
> Note that this one does
Hi Tony,
Tony Berth wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200:
> but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want!
> I just want to patch an existing system!
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
Note that this one doesn't talk about cvs checkout at all,
but r
Tony Berth writes:
> but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I
> just want to patch an existing system!
>
> [bla bla bla didn't read the docs]
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
--
Guillaume Pinot ht
Tony Berth writes:
> Instead of
>
> '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src'
>
> I applied
>
> '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src'
>
> in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error!
That command would get most likey you -current source, so it's no
surprise the patch
but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I
just want to patch an existing system!
Instead of
'# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src'
I applied
'# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src'
in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error!
On M
Tony Berth wrote:
did the following:
after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting
applied:
# *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src*
...
now, as I suggested, go read FAQ5 and find out what this does.
(and yes, I guessed right. :)
Nick.
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, Tony Berth wrote:
> From: Tony Berth
> To: Nick Holland
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:03:08
> Subject: Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to
> kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
>
> did the following:
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:03:08PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> did the following:
>
> after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting
>
> applied:
>
> # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src*
>
> using *cvsroot=anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs*
That gets you -stable. Don'
patch I get
> the
> > following:
> ...
> > Patching file kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 3463 (offset 12 lines).
> > Hunk #2 failed at 3543.
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 3607 (offset 7 lines).
> > 1 out of 3 hunk
succeeded at 3607 (offset 7 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to
> kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
> done
you did something wrong.
You didn't tell us what you did, so that's the most I can^Wwill say.
For giggles, I just tested it against the 4.7 source, and
lines).
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to
kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
done
-
Thanks
Tony
12 matches
Mail list logo
