On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
> with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
> prefixes. That count requires a roundtrip to the RDE to find and sometimes
> this takes a wh
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
> with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
> prefixes. That count requires a roundtrip to the RDE to find and sometimes
> this takes a wh
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:50:09AM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
> sum", no?
>
The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
prefi
If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
sum", no?
/Benno
Denis Fondras(open...@ledeuns.net) on 2016.04.17 18:09:18 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number
> of
> prefixes. Here is a patch that add these inf
> If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
> sum", no?
>
Of course but I would have to parse day/hour/minute/second. It is simpler if
bgpd can give me the value straight.
Denis
Hello,
When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number of
prefixes. Here is a patch that add these informations to "bgpctl show sum
terse"
Before :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 Established
After :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 Established 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
