* Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-01-03 19:00]:
> Well because for me 80:82 is (80, 81, 82) and 82:80 the same
> items and so the same range.
but it is NOT the same. I'd claim your expectations is strange ;)
> So what is the meaning for PF of the range 82:80? If this is a non
> sense, an error from pfc
Le Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:54:18 +0100,
Henning Brauer a icrit :
Hello,
> * Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-01-03 17:45]:
> > I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges,
> > for example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
>
> nope.
>
> Ports and ranges of po
For those of us playing the CS home game. Is this an example of
left-to right evaluation? My thought on this was that the value 81
isn't greater than 82 and isn't less than 80, so the rule doesn't
match.
* Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-01-03 17:45]:
> I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
> example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
nope.
Ports and ranges of ports are specified using these operators:
: (range including
Hello, happy new year.
I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
PF or pfctl does not check that port1 <= port2 and if port1 > port2 the
port range is not correct.
For example 82 >< 80 is not the same as 80 >< 8
5 matches
Mail list logo
