On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/24/08, Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> is there any chance realistic chance that python will be part of the obsd
>> default at some point in the forseeable future?
>
> No.
unless perhaps a new developer
On 5/24/08, Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about the python license?
How about them Yankees?
> Given that is
> there any chance realistic chance that python will be part of the obsd
> default at some point in the forseeable future?
No.
* Martin Marcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting
> and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I
> think that the license under which python is distributed is quite
> similiar to a BSD license. Especiall this:
do you
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:23PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting
> and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I
> think that the license under which python is distributed is quite
> similiar to
> "Martin" == Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting
Martin> and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I
Martin> think that the license under which python is distributed is quite
Martin> s
Martin Marcher wrote:
License is here: http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5/license/
http://www.python.org/download/releases//license/
Yeah, that's exactly like the BSD license, elegant and simple.
Hello,
How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting
and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I
think that the license under which python is distributed is quite
similiar to a BSD license. Especiall this:
"""
GPL-compatible doesn't mean that we're
7 matches
Mail list logo
