On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:05:07AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:30:28PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> >> > What would be the rationale for 640? ;)
> >>
> >> Well according to cvs log:
> >> "it can be easily changed if you like it another way. m
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:30:28PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>> > What would be the rationale for 640? ;)
>>
>> Well according to cvs log:
>> "it can be easily changed if you like it another way. millert,"
>>
>> So I guess one rationale might be as simple as "because"
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:30:28PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> > What would be the rationale for 640? ;)
>
> Well according to cvs log:
> "it can be easily changed if you like it another way. millert,"
>
> So I guess one rationale might be as simple as "because" ;)
>
Does anything get posted
> What would be the rationale for 640? ;)
Well according to cvs log:
"it can be easily changed if you like it another way. millert,"
So I guess one rationale might be as simple as "because" ;)
-B
On 04/12/2007, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04/12/2007, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm noticing that the messages log seems to be world readable in 4.2
> > e.g.
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1801 Dec 4 17:51 messages
> >
> > What's up wit
On 04/12/2007, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm noticing that the messages log seems to be world readable in 4.2
> e.g.
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1801 Dec 4 17:51 messages
>
> What's up with that? Shouldn't it be set to 640? If not what is the
> rationale for 644
I'm noticing that the messages log seems to be world readable in 4.2
e.g.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1801 Dec 4 17:51 messages
What's up with that? Shouldn't it be set to 640? If not what is the
rationale for 644?
-Lars
7 matches
Mail list logo