On Mon, Sep 11 2017, Jan Stary wrote:
> There used to be /usr/sbin/slaacd, which is now /sbin/slaacd
> and current.html says to rm /usr/sbin/slaacd.
>
> There is still /usr/sbin/slaacctl - is that intended,
> or should it be in /sbin as well?
I think it's intended, slaacctl is not needed during e
There used to be /usr/sbin/slaacd, which is now /sbin/slaacd
and current.html says to rm /usr/sbin/slaacd.
There is still /usr/sbin/slaacctl - is that intended,
or should it be in /sbin as well?
Jan
2 matches
Mail list logo
