If you use a snapshot you'll be very close to current and
--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> From: Jacob Meuser
> Subject: Re: confused about updating -current
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, 29 April, 2010, 2:59
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:05:06PM
> -0500, Chris Bennett wrote
--- On Wed, 28/4/10, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
>
> I also found whilst the requests per second stayed the same
> for 4.6 to 4.7
> (web page) the throughput doubled (cpu bottlenecked).
>
>
Sorry mistyped that, it was the requests that bottlenecked the
cpu, not the throughput so 4.7 may be
I've written setup scripts (took a while though) for my different systems
which will never be as quick as the upgrade process but I've got it reasonably
quick and means I can keep moving forward like the openbsd project does,
switch between current, stable and snapshots without a sudden need to sp
> Now I'm seeing new PCs with.
> 1) Primary partition for the M$ equivalent of /boot
> 2) Primary partition with the main M$ install
> 3) Primary partition with the recovery bits.
>
> Install Linux and that 4th primary partition becomes the
> extended
> partition. No place for OpenBSD.
You can ac
Google turned up Races and dictionary attacks if the skey file is readable. I
imagine dictionary attacks via bsd auth would be the only possible known
attack on a properly setup system.
I am intending to use it as a secondary line of defense but how secure would
skey be as a primary defense.
Are
> If you define "freedom" by the number of restrictions, then
> the only
> free license would be no license at all. Public domain. No
> copyright.
> Thus no restrictions. No ALL CAPs notices. Not even
> crediting the
> original developers.
So you think that giving people the freedom to know where
I'm unsure about using i386 or amd64 for an apache/php ssl webserver with
relayd and pf running. I may test both as it shouldn't take too long, but I'd
certainly like to know what people think. This isn't for a system with a large
amount of memory. I imagine I'll need more systems and interfaces be
--- On Thu, 4/3/10, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> From: Tomas Bodzar
> Subject: Re: -current or -stable [was: Not another Browser Question]
> To: trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, 4 March, 2010, 14:37
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:52
> PM,
> wrote:
> > I had read the fa
I had read the faq many times before asking the question. I admit not just
beforehand. I wasn't specific enough about my thought processes and asked too
many questions at once, but thanks for all the insights.
I've decided to use release when available and switch to current as needed.
Out of inte
I noticed the mailing list archives seem to have different levels of content
or maybe search mechanism (more found in gmane than monkey.org). What do
people think is the best one, the danger being that one could possibly get
overloaded, if mentioned here.
KeV
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:28:39 -0800
"J.C. Roberts" wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:44:38 + (GMT) trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk
> wrote:
>
> The short answer is painfully simple; if you're running OpenBSD as your
> desktop/laptop and you have a clue, then run just -current.
>
Your right, I must fo
Hey all
Please don't dismiss me because what I have been doing is unsupported untill
you've read a little, I do realise you do far too much for too little as it is
and when I make enough money I'll hopefully become a donator and regular
merchandise/cd buyer.
Whilst the subject of firefox on curre
Hi,
The Question first (may save time)
I've seen examples of earlier versions than Apache 1.3.29 said to be working
with byte-range requests, has anyone got the byte range requests to work with
openbsd without using php code or know how this can be done or if it works by
default.
The Story
I'
13 matches
Mail list logo
