I believe I had this same problem when I was compiling the source offered on
iperf's site. This was resolved by compiling the version offered by ports.
On Feb 7, 2008 5:08 AM, Joe Warren-Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
>
> Hey ther
ll report my finding shortly. Again though
, this seems over excessive.
On 10/1/07, rezidue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I've now got both of my edge routers running 4.1 and there is definitely a
> speed improvement over all. Unfortunately I can't seem to get dr
On 9/26/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2007/09/26 13:50, rezidue wrote:
> >
> > >Order a 4.2 CD and install it as soon as you get it. 4.2 removed
> many
> > >bottlenecks in the network stack. In the meanwhile
For some reason I can't seem to reply to the earlier responses. Hopefully
this gets through.
On 9/26/07, Bryan Irvine < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What have you looked at? are you running pf? what kind of ruleset?
> Tried simplifying it?
>
>--Bryan
I wasn't running pf originally when
Hopefully this makes it through , I've been trying to post comments all day
but they don't seem to make it here.
To Bryan, I wasn't running pf originally when I noticed this problem but I
am now just to block ssh from the outside. I've disabled and re-enabled pf
to see if it affects throughput an
I've been having problems with throughput on a box I'm using as an edge
gateway. I can't seem to get it to push out more than 150Mb/sec at about
20k pps. It's a Tyan Thunder K8SR (S2881) board that has two gig broadcom
interfaces on a shared pci-x bus. It's on the bcm5704c chipset and I'm
runnin
I guess I should start from the beginning. When I originally started this
project my goal was to have two machines running carp between them and have
the master connect to two different ISP's sending full routes. This was
working fine and failover didn't cause any issues. At least I thought
ever
7 matches
Mail list logo