Re: Scaling DNS with CARP + pf (+ hoststated ?)

han 2 resolver boxes. Anyone successfully running similar scenario ? Cheers (and thanks for all suggestions), r. > reje wrote: > > Yes, we have that much DNS requests hiting our > > servers > > (we are not experiencing any DoS but from > > legitimate > > user request

Re: Scaling DNS with CARP + pf (+ hoststated ?)

Please take a look at this Cisco document regarding Scaling DNS services and CSM: http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns377/c649/cdccont_0900aecd800eb95d.pdf p.s.- long ago read DNS & BIND but this book assumes tolerance to DNS timeouts and availability of more than two DNS IP

Re: Scaling DNS with CARP + pf (+ hoststated ?)

wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:03:40 -0700 (PDT), reje > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm wondering is there a way to scale DNS service > > using OpenBSD's CARP and loadbalancing/pool > features > > of pf ? How about hos

Scaling DNS with CARP + pf (+ hoststated ?)

nslation). So please, any suggestions how to make DNS loadbalancing on OpenBSD work ? It would be great if this can be done with hoststated so I would have enough arguments to choose OpenBSD over Cisco CSM (which is currently being considered for this tas