Re: [openbsd] fwd: [deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/]

2010-06-27 Thread pourlori
Haters please go off-list, identity is not relevant on a discussion list, I do not need attention nor personal implication. I'd be delighted to speak about privacy and stuff with my detractors, off-list. SELinux is another debate, I don't want to waste your time with it. Thanks for your participat

Re: [openbsd] fwd: [dera...@cvs.openbsd.org: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/]

2010-06-24 Thread pourlori
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:39:10 +0200 Aaron Glenn wrote: >On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:26 PM, wrote: >> >> I do not wish to begin a troll-like thread, I just want the >truth. > >yes you do; no you don't. >no one cares; please go away. You are wrong, if you are unable to reply properly to my request

Re: [openbsd] fwd: [dera...@cvs.openbsd.org: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/]

2010-06-22 Thread pourlori
Hello misc, I was wondering if these accusations against OpenBSD were true, I doubt he is lying, maybe he is just not telling the whole truth. http://www.uaoug.org.ua/archive/msg01088.html The first part is irrelevant, Linux may have implemented the sysctl switch before OpenBSD. However, thei