Re: Gstreamer-1.0, uaudio(4) and sndio(7) with raw devices.

Apologies for the awful formatting gmail inflicted on my previous mail... Gstreamer info and dmesg below. gstreamer1-1.10.4 framework for streaming media gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.10.4 base elements for GStreamer >> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOT 3.33 boot> booting hd0a:/bsd: 6994272+2216968+259456+0+67

Gstreamer-1.0, uaudio(4) and sndio(7) with raw devices.

It appears that Gstreamer-1.0 can't access raw uaudio(4) devices (rsnd/n). I'm struggling to debug further so wanted to ask if this is expected to work or a known limitation of OpenBSD's sndio(7) implementation for gstreamer? This is where I've got to so far: Gstreamer-1.0 works fine with uaud

uvideo(4) problems in recent snaps?

Has anyone noticed problems with uvideo(4) in recent snapshots? The issue I'm seeing is reproducible with video(1) - just run it and wait. After some seconds or minutes no new frames arrive and video(1) is waiting on poll(2). Larger frame sizes seem to decrease the time needed to achieve this stat

Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I assume you want it that way for a reason. It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-) Thanks for looking Gilles. Percy. On 17 July 2012 19:04, Gilles Chehade wrote: > mh, is it really that verbose ?

trivial smtpd scheduler diff

Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose? Cheers, Percy. Index: scheduler.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c --- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11:1

Smtpd.conf(5) %a and %u

Hi all. Smtpd.conf(5) states that %a expands to the user before alias resolution and %u after. Is it the other way round? I am probably missing something but on the latest i386 snap it seems %a and %u do the opposite to what smtpd.conf(5) claims? Can anyone clarify? Many thanks Percy

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

http://www.sinet.bt.com/506v1p0.pdf

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

For the archives sake, we finally solved this. pppoe(4) never requests an mru during lcp negotiation (and acks any reasonable mru offered). In our case we were being offered an mru (1492) by the BT AC (BRAS) which we ack'd. With the mru agreed at both ends of the link our auth with the BT bras succ

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

On 30 December 2011 01:17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I haven't seen this with pppoe(4) and any of: zen fttc, demon adsl > (ipstream), aaisp adsl (ipstream or 21cn), bogons adsl (ipstream). OK thanks. That's a decent list of positives. > Does your ISP have reachable technical people that might b

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

On 28 December 2011 21:36, percy piper wrote: > pppoe(4) did not work. We need to authenticate with chap first, then > pap. pppoe(4) forces the exclusive use of either one or the other. Actually this is not true. Both use chap. There is no pap. The first chap challenge succeeds (to the

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

Hi, we finally went live today so a small summary of how it went. pppoe(4) did not work. We need to authenticate with chap first, then pap. pppoe(4) forces the exclusive use of either one or the other. This was an unexpected gotcha and I will look at the code to see what can be done. pppoe(8) wor

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

Hi Stuart and thank you for the excellent info. It looks like we're good then, our install is due this coming Monday so I will refer to your mail as we proceed through the initial setup. Oh, and for the archives s/FTTC/FTTP. Percy.

OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

Is anyone using OpenBSD as the 'front-end' router on a UK fibre (FTTC) broadband circuit? We are due to start trialling a 100Mb FTTC broadband and hope to use an OpenBSD box as the first stage router (i.e. to replace what the Home Hub would normally do). We know the presentation (from BT) is ether

Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T60 won't resume

>> There was a brief window in in late July/early August about a week >> long where it would successfully suspend and resume, but the screen >> would never turn back on. Anytime before or after that and it >> would suspend fine, but when it resumes it's totally unresponsive >> to anything except a

Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T60 won't resume

> Yes, this started to happen lately with current. > It seems the guilty commit has been just backed out. Thanks Luca, would you mind sending me a pcidump -v please?

Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T60 won't resume

>> It has an ATI Radeon Mobility X1400 btw. > I have the same issue with resume. Did either of you have working resume ever before?

Re: Restore from SCSI tape on recent i386 snapshot

Just wanted to mention my appreciation and admiration for those who have the knowledge and ability and give it to us for free. But especially krw@ who found and fixed what turned out to be (in my uneducated opinion) an obscure bug buried deep in the SCSI code. Thanks all, and thanks indeed Ken.

Restore from SCSI tape on recent i386 snapshot

I'm having trouble with restore from SCSI tape with the June 6th i386 snapshot. I have a few i386 boxes that dump ~200GB data to tape each night. I updated one to the June 6th i386 snapshot and dump continues to work. e.g.: sudo dump -a0 /dev/wd0a DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Tue Jun 8 18: