ier
status" issue though.
Let me know if I can extract any config for you.
HTH,
Livio
On 2020-12-12 16:44, Daniel Jakots wrote:
Hi,
I've been using a LACP trunk on my apu (with the three em(4)). On
top of which I have some vlans. I've been doing that for years and it's
Thank you @Noth.
You are right. The OpenBSD PF FAQ also says:
> PF will only use one processor, so multiple processors (or multiple cores)
WILL NOT improve PF performance.
For PC Engines APU users, I can highly recommend to update the BIOS. It improved
my networking performance quite a bit:
https
Thank you for your inputs - @Jordan, @Tom, @Christian
On 1/30/2020 9:07 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Livio are you running iperf on the apu ?
> The apu doesnt have much cpu to generate packets from iperf...
> Forwarding perf should about 450m on an apu c2 with pf enabled and about
> 850m-
1/30/2020 7:06 PM, livio wrote:
> @KatolaZ and @remi
>
> Thank you for your inputs on iperf2 vs. iperf3.
>
> After all the tests I needed a clean setup again and reinstalled both
> OpenBSD and Window 10.
>
> With the new notebook (Dell vs Lenovo) I have different resu
@KatolaZ and @remi
Thank you for your inputs on iperf2 vs. iperf3.
After all the tests I needed a clean setup again and reinstalled both
OpenBSD and Window 10.
With the new notebook (Dell vs Lenovo) I have different results.
Dell: ~ 200Mbit/s
Lenovo: ~ 145Mbit/s
iperf2 vs. iperf3 (I also ran th
To answer your second question, I did not change any sysctls or other
settings on the OpenBSD. The only thing I ran was pfctl -d.
My installation guide was:
https://github.com/elad/openbsd-apu2
- amd/install66.fs
- stty com0 115200
- set tty com0
On 1/30/2020 5:39 PM, livio wrote:
> Yes
Yes, I tried yet another cable. I hope this gives some credibility:
https://ibb.co/m4mrWt3
I now tried with 3 different cables (and vendors). As you can see the
patch cable is brand new. I am also setting up a new Windows 10 notebook
on the right.
But again, I achieve 940Mbit/s with the exact sam
/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 17.3 MBytes 146 Mbits/sec
On 1/30/2020 5:04 PM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:50:59PM +0100, livio wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> Thanks for your reply. I would already be quite happy with ~500Mbit/s.
>> My test do not involve a sw
,txpause)
status: active
inet 10.10.1.241 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.10.1.255
Thank you,
Livio
On 1/30/2020 4:38 PM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 03:43:41PM +0100, livio wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am unable to achieve decent throughput wi
: https://pcengines.ch/apu2c0.htm
dmesg output:
https://paste.ee/p/OeRbI
Any inputs and help is highly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Livio
PS: I ran the same tests on an APU1c4 with Realtek RTL8111E interfaces.
The results were lower - around 95Mbit/s.
https://pcengines.ch/apu1c4.htm
PPS: Others also
10 matches
Mail list logo
