Hello
Syracuse, NY -- no CD, but poster has arrived. looks great!
http://ce.gl/openbsd-5.8-poster.jpg
ian
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:51 AM, M Wheeler <6f84c...@refn.co.uk> wrote:
> CD's arrived today UK. Thanks again.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> There are dragons.
>
ingo, theo:
sorry to post toxic advice, and thanks for the knowledge. i did not realize
how shlib_version worked. i must have gotten lucky with my build but i
should go back and fix it properly now
ian
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a
fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc
edit 'shlib_version' to have the appropriate major/minor versions
(pkg
If you are fluent in two or more languages you might be able to help
out with translations. Bug-hunting (with proper reporting habits!) is
always appreciated too.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I very much believe the OpenBSD is important and needs support. I am not a
5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>Hopefully you agree that the file name "snapshots/amd64/install56.iso"
>>is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
>>kind of upgrade p
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Lester wrote:
> Would the /bin/sh shell in OpenBSD, which is a "reimplementation of bash" be
> affected by either of these exploits? So happy to learn no action is needed
> on my part for my OpenBSD sever :)
/bin/sh is an implementation of *the bourne she
> Umm, there are at least
> 24 links on that page to various projects that need done, to which are
if you don't have the time to look through a list of a couple dozen
items for the subject of what you have been criticizing, then i don't
have the time to reply to your petty, innocuous emails. i don
> refering to http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/ does not contain, as far as
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/gsoc2014.html
> software that you speak of be portable to Linux or is it BSD only? I've
i am planning (post-GSOC) on writing an archlinux PKGBUILD and
eventually a debian package.
> https://uglyman.kremlin.cc/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=systemd-utl.git There
> is either something wrong with the web page or firefox as it mentions
> that the connection was reset while the page was loading. However,
> I've used
you probably caught me in the middle of a reboot
> yet. But I wanted to k
> that doesn't make the slightest sense.
>
> "pure C" can be and often is perfectly portable.
those were not the right words, i meant to convey that because systemd
uses its own DBus binding (and not an already-ported lib like
GIO/GDbus) it would be difficult to port, as that binding is seemingly
> that bsd is being crowded out, a thought that had not crossed my mind.
> I wanted to know, before assuming that it is the case everywhere, do
> people really not like systemd and is it really hurting bsd? If so,
> I'd be interested in doing something about it. Thanks, David
yes, systemd has beco
hi!
i'm a student working on four DBus daemons that emulate the behavior of
systemd ones as to allow porting code that depends on systemd less of a
hassle
i've set up gitweb to track my progress, you can find it here:
https://uglyman.kremlin.cc/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=systemd-utl.git;
the 'master' b
12 matches
Mail list logo
