Re: kernel livelock(?), reproducible at my -stable 4.4

> I run 4.4 stable with only one tweak: iic at piixpm disabled > (commented in GENERIC): > #iic* at piixpm? # disabled because boot freezed on it I rebuild kernel without this tweak and disable iic in UKC. Results in tech@ list. -- engineer

Some mystic with one spamdb WHITE record

162|mail.plusoft.com.br||< o...@email >|1231915013|1231917030|1231929413|6|0 GREY|200.162.44.162|mail.plusoft.com.br||< o...@email >|1231915015|1231917032|1231929415|6|0 GREY|200.162.44.162|mail.plusoft.com.br||< o...@email >|1231915013|1231917030|1231929413|6|0 GREY|200.162.44.162|mail.plusoft.com.br||< o...@email >|1231915015|1231917032|1231929415|6|0 # date -r 1231915016 Wed Jan 14 11:36:56 YEKT 2009 # date Wed Jan 14 14:27:06 YEKT 2009 What is it? Why this WHITE entry raised again? I just can't do anything with itb& And can't delete annoying GREY entries. -- engineer

Re: spamd won't use my WHITElist

immeditately preceeding blacklists. Check > spamd.conf(5) for more details. > > What you want is possible, but you have to do it yourself in pf.conf. > The good news is that it's easy... Ok, I understand. Thank's. -- engineer

Re: spamd won't use my WHITElist

; 127.0.0.1 port spamd Oh, sorry, I forgot to supply one string. Actually it looks like this: no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to $mx_IP port smtp rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $mx_IP port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd -- engineer

spamd won't use my WHITElist

9993|1231834393|1231834393|1|0 It seems like spamd completely skipped WHITElisted network (194.67.23.0 - 194.67.23.255). I was thinking that all WHITElisted nets will be in the immediately, just after spamd started... -- engineer

Re: uvm_fault under load

> This issue is likely to have been addressed by the reliability fix #005, > as seen on http://www.openbsd.org/errata44.html. It helps. Thank you! -- engineer

uvm_fault under load

; using exception 16 fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec biomask e765 netmask ef65 ttymask mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support softraid0 at root root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b -- engineer

Re: raidctl: fail (rebuild later) VS wait for parity

Hi, engineer. > Hmm... I done this trisk, but it's not works ;). I add > CHECK=`raidctl -s raid1 | grep '/dev/wd1e: optimal'` > if [ -n "$CHECK" ]; then > raidctl -f /dev/wd1e raid1 > fi > # Check parity on raid devices. > raidctl -P all

Re: raidctl: fail (rebuild later) VS wait for parity

Hi, engineer. Hmm... I done this trisk, but it's not works ;). I add CHECK=`raidctl -s raid1 | grep '/dev/wd1e: optimal'` if [ -n "$CHECK" ]; then raidctl -f /dev/wd1e raid1 fi # Check parity on raid devices. raidctl -P all into /etc/rc on /dev/wd0a (where liv

raidctl: fail (rebuild later) VS wait for parity

root/admin, or so... But, again, let it be, anyhow, SYSTEM WORKING. I understand that it is very specific solution, very dependent on that configuration, but this if not for all cases, this is for SUCH cases! And this can be useful for those who use such configurations. So, what you can say about this? -- engineer

raid mirror VS cdd mirror

fore start system. I read ccd(4), ccdconfig(4), but they are not describe what I want to know. And, briefly, what difference between RAID and CCD in such fields like "performance", "what to do after one disk fail", and "what will be when one disk fail while system running". -- engineer

raidctl -P all in /etc/rc

cks. This is so long with my more that 150G on RAID. I want ask, what will occur if not do "raidctl -P all" in /etc/rc, but set it in /etc/rc.local, after daemons started? What can fsck with such "uncleaned/unreconstructed" RAID? -- engineer

Re: interface groups and pf

} queue q_pri_2 priority 7 queue q_def_2 priority 1 priq(default) So, can I dispense just one altq? altq on $grp priq bandwidth 10Mb queue { q_pri, q_def } queue q_pri priority 7 queue q_def priority 1 priq(default) -- engineer