On 2012-09-06 21:14, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:00:48PM +0200, za...@gmx.com wrote:
On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
attributes were supported in O
On 2012-09-06 18:35, Ted Unangst wrote:
>There are no extended attributes, so no support is necessary.
I am confused. I was under the impression that extended
attributes were supported in OpenBSD's native filesystems.
In fact, I came across references to them in some online
documentation, for
Hi,
for which programming languages a binding for OpenBSD's native filesystem is
already available? Support for extended attributes is also needed.
I would be particularly interested in Ada or Lua bindings, but willing to
consider alternatives.
Thanks
Ben
On 2012-08-11 03:21, Andres Perera wrote:
i find it hard to believe you're involved in such project. "more
portable", "more secure" don't mean anything unless details are
involved. i mean, if it runs on your target hosts, what could "more
portable" possibly mean?
it's better to say: i'm trying o
On 2012-08-10 15:59, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > 2012/8/10 :
>> >> Has any modern filesystem been ported to OpenBSD? I really need to know,
>> >> because this issue may constitute a stumbling block to my adoption of
>> >> OpenBSD.
> > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#Journaling
> >
> > OpenBS
Hi
A client of mine asked me if I can develop a BSD project for them. I don't have
much experience with BSDs, and I have been collecting some background
information.
I was given the choice between OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Now, since portability is not all that important, I was oriented towards
OpenB
6 matches
Mail list logo
