Re: cp(1) bug ?

2007-10-20 Thread a.padilla
I do believe so, yes. a.padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Oct 20, 2007, at 5:59 AM, Tom Van Looy wrote: > on unix everything is a file? > > >> - Oorspronkelijk bericht - >> Van: Ted Unangst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Verzonden: zaterdag, oktober 20, 2007 01:

Re: pf

2007-10-06 Thread a.padilla
r I'm in way over my head. So again, sorry for troubling you. I will come back, perhaps when I have better knowledge. Thanks for all of your help. You guys are great. On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:49 PM, ropers wrote: On 06/10/2007, a.padilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know its not opt

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
at is the output of the following ifconfig -A pfctl -s all sysctl -a|grep forward How are the obsd box and the client connected, from a networking perspective? Wired? Hub/Switch? direct with cross over cable? -Chad On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:21 PM, a.padilla wrote: I commented out &quo

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
ver that's wrong? On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Joe Gibbens wrote: > > rl0 is connected to the internet. > On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:52 PM, ropers wrote: > > > On 05/10/2007, a.padilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I commented everything out except the nat rul

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
both do have IP's. dc0 has a private IP. rl0 is connected to the internet. On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:52 PM, ropers wrote: On 05/10/2007, a.padilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I commented everything out except the nat rule and "pass out keep state" still nothing. Sorry to

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
has a gateway and all masks are correct. Try doing traceroute's and working your way up James - Original Message - From: "a.padilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Joe Gibbens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 1:10 PM Subject:

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
I commented everything out except the nat rule and "pass out keep state" still nothing. On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Joe Gibbens wrote: I commented out "block in" for testing purposes. still, no success. If you know what's wrong, please don' t just answer. I want to understand the solution.

Re: pf

2007-10-05 Thread a.padilla
lnet} to any keep state I commented out "block in" for testing purposes. still, no success. If you know what's wrong, please don' t just answer. I want to understand the solution. ip forwarding is set to 1 and pf is enabled. On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Roman Stro

pf

2007-10-04 Thread a.padilla
Hi, I'm a student trying to learn pf on my own. I'm trying to set up a nat. I've read documentation yet I still can't get the internal machine to communicate to the outside world. I've been following this documentation: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ nat.html before I go any further, is