Hi all...
Is there any side effect of having both local and remote IPs in the peer
directives in sasyncd.conf?
For example:
server1: 10.0.0.2
server2: 10.0.0.3
carp:10.0.0.1
So, can I have in both sasyncd.conf:
---
peer 10.0.0.2
peer 10.0.0.3
---
The idea is to avoid different configurat
> exim is an insecure piece of shit that makes old sendmail look good.
> besides, it is not free.
Curiosity here since we are exim users... what makes it insecure?
Should we be really worried about running it?
Cheers,
g.
Greetings...
We are trying to use a couple routers with carp and uplinks with 2
different providers. One router as master and another one slave. The
slave getting all the routes from the master using IBGP.
The problem is that when I bring to interface of the master down to test
if the failover wo
> net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen defines how many packets can be queued in the IP
> input queue before further packets are dropped. Packets comming from the
> network card are first put into this queue and the actuall IP packet
> processing is done later. Gigabit cards with interrupt mitigation may spit
>
Hi Claudio...
What does 'net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=256' do for us?
Tried a few 'man', and a few google searches and I wasn't very
successful. Found tons of other posts telling ppl to bump up that
sysctl, but never found what it does exactly.
Cheers,
g.
YES! That's exactly what I was looking for!
Thanks a lot Todd!
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> so spake Tom Bombadil (grlists):
>
>> I guess this is a stupid question...
>>
>> But is there any way to get a list of all files in
I guess this is a stupid question...
But is there any way to get a list of all files in the filesystem
without using 'find'?
For a big drive with millions of small files, running find is just too slow.
Thanks for any hint.
> Probably Bad things.
Oh-oh... I increased it to 2 minutes. Thing are a bit better now.
> Shouldn't be. What rev of openbsd are you running this spamd box on?
> I run it on a single ide drive, I'm probably bigger than your site.
Really? We get mail for different companies... Even t
Hi all...
What happens if we change "#define DB_SCAN_INTERVAL 60" to 600 in
/usr/src/libexec/spamd/grey.h?
Sorry, I'm no C coder...
Basically we just want to spread out table scans for now until we get
new hardware in, because it's fairly heavy on an single IDE drive.
Does DB_SCAN_INTERVAL have
>> This is a pretty staple Dell 1750, with two extra dual-port syskonnects.
>
>> ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 16 pins
>> ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8
>> ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 9 pa 0xfec01000, version 11, 16 pins
>> ioapic1: misconfigured as api
Well...
I guess I'm the unluckiest man on earth:
Aug 28 21:55:59 van-fw1 /bsd: msk3: watchdog timeout
Aug 28 21:56:00 van-fw1 /bsd: msk2: phy failed to come ready
Aug 28 21:56:31 van-fw1 last message repeated 77 times
Aug 28 21:58:32 van-fw1 last message repeated 297 times
Aug 28 22:00:00 van-fw
> The 5704 has a particularly crappy DMA controller. This might be the usual
> problems of the bge hardware. Not only does it support only one DMA transfer
> in parallel, it also jams for some times, and if it has a particularly bad
> day, it jams the bus, too.
>
> There might be a description on
Greetings...
I'm getting a few "bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting" errors on 4.1-stable
The box becomes unresponsive for a minute or so, and then comes back to
life.
Any hints?
Thanks,
g.
# dmesg
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Mon Aug 27 11:04:17 UTC 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sy
Greetings all...
We bought a SK-9S22 (pci-x) card a while ago, and even though 'man msk'
listed it as working on 4.0, it actually didn't work.
So, now we are thinking about a SK-9E22 (pci-e) for another box, and we
think we should ask if this model is working on 4.1 before actually
spending any m
As far as I understand from them, the sysadmin was showing the defer to
his boss using a telnet session, and the boss got pissed off, because
they are actually very diligent about their spam policies.
Anyways, I just wanted to know if it there was another way to change the
250 messages without cha
> Editing the binary? (Is recompiling really so hard?)
Not hard, just changed it right now... But sometimes it pays to ask
around to see if there is a simpler way that doesn't involve messing
around with the original source code.
> Ah, you'll be looking for the OpenBSD Corporate Edition - with su
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
nothing.
"man spamd" and a quick search in the ML archiv
Money just spoils the weak in character. Lack money is what spoils
everything ;)
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> BEST OF THE LUCK, GUYS!!!
>
> DON'T LET THE MONEY TO SPOIL EVERYTHING!!!
>
> HOPE ON YOU!
Hi all...
is there any support for LACP on openbsd? On any plan to have it working?
A quick read on trunk(4) doesn't look very promising, but I read an
interview on onlamp a while ago saying it would be available sometime.
Thanks!
> I'm currently going in to test some new stuff that
> will fix this problem. so as theo said. wait a few days..
damn... you guys rock!
Will it be something in the lines of pfsync?
Cheers
I wonder how people are coping with master downtime when using spamd?
Is it a good idea to regularly dump into a file, rsync it
to the backup carp server, and load these IPs in a separate table?
I was thinking of lowering "whiteexp" on spamd as well (to have a leaner DB)
>From what I gather from
Thank you all for the input.
jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
>> * Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 15:09]:
>>> Greetings...
>>>
>>> By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I ad
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
spamd(8) says:
"spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4) table."
How exactly does spamd configure spamd-white table?
The objective i
> Here, here! I agree with Diana! Now go away with your silly questions!
> Why would anyone want to work for you?
E... unemployement?
The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user wanted a job,
which I bet many among us might be interested.
A bit off topic, yes but if that doesn't apply to someone, bitching just
creates more noise... As it is clearly stated in that page:
"Complaining about and commenting upon spam on
Hey all...
We got a few SysKonnect SK-9S22 dual port cards, and they don't work
under 4.0, nor under stable (as of 19/12/2006). We got these cards
because it was listed in the msk(4) manual pages:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=msk&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+4.0&arch=i386&fo
Greetings all... This was probably discussed before, but I couldn't
really find anything in the archives.
1) We have a carp0 interface with a few aliases in it, and carp works
fine between master (SERVER-A) and backup (SERVER-B)... until...
2) ... we plumb a another new alias into SERVER-B's carp
mm... I thought it was to save ~500K in the kernel:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#Optraid
Is there any other reason?
Cheers
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> RAIDFrame is disabled in GENERIC for a reason you know.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:48AM -0700, Tom Bombadil wrote:
&g
Yes... I agree with with you... not really my decision at the time,
since I didn't work here... but I guess the thought was that RaidFrame
would provide more uptime in case of multiple harddrive failures, and
not really data protection.
Thanks Daniel
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Tom Bombad
Unfortunately we cannot provide a bug report for now, because we set
ddb.panic=0 because those boxes are in production, and were having the
same panic at the exact same time... So, no debugger for now or else
I'll get myself fired :)
We are trying to convince the boss to order a box with completel
Hi all,
This subject always comes up in the list, but due to the evolving nature
of the the driver, we (non-developers) always have to keep bugging
people about it.
How's the status of the broadcom bge(4) drive?
Is it stable and fast enough?
Many of the big server makers (HP, sun, etc) seem to
31 matches
Mail list logo
