Am Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:50:55 +0200
schrieb "Holger Glaess" :
> i run 2 guests with 5.1 on proxmox 2.1 distribution .
>
> i don't know what the version of kvm is behind of proxmox.
>
> but openbsd 5.1 run as expected "normal" ;)
I tried several OpenBSD versions between 4.8 and 5.1, both i386 and
Am Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:28:27 -0400
schrieb Jason Healy :
> By changing to a /30 transit and doing away with the aliases,
> performance on the OpenBSD box improved substantially.
Not sure, if I understand you right: Did you move the /23 on another
ethernet interface when establishing the transit n
Am Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:45:31 -0400
schrieb Brian Hechinger :
> I'm trying to replace my single OpenBSD firewall with a pair of
> redundant firewalls. I've been testing this (thanks to the power of
> VMware) and so far haven't gotten it to work the way I want/need.
[..]
> I'd like OSPF to hand ou
Can anyone give me a hint how to setup a pair of "CARPed" firewall
machines to access an ISP via an direct ethernet link (fiber). He
assigned us a customer network ( /29) and a transit network ( /30) to
connect our (customer) network with his backbone without extra router
machine. All (active) addr
Am Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:46:38 +0530
schrieb Girish Venkatachalam :
> While someone actually writes an article on undeadly on VPNs please
> also write about MPLS VPN creation as I find no documentation about
> this.
Usually you don't need this if you are not the MPLS-provider/carrier
who owns and r
Am Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:35:16 +0300
schrieb Kostas Zorbadelos :
> if this has been discussed in the past, forgive my asking and please
> point me to the archives. I am interested in building a server VPN
> solution for a sensitive corporate LAN. The use case is travelling,
> roaming users who just
Am Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:13:42 -0500
schrieb Richard Thornton :
> I wanted to use a linux but the only current linux for sparc64 is
> debian 6.03 and it seems incompatible with the rage xl video on the
> sun blade giving me out of sync errors. Openbsd seems to have
> better drivers since it works
Am Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:51:05 -0600
schrieb "Ted Wynnychenko" :
> With 4.5, I had snort listening to pflog0, because I understood that
> listening to the interface directly (e.g. "bge0") would not work
> since any packets dropped by pf would not be seen by snort.
pflog0 only shows the packets that
Running a pair of OpenBSD-4.8-boxes as NAT-Firewall between public
Internet and some Linux-webservers in a DMZ basically works fine so far.
But this week a client enabled RFC-1323 and his http/https-access to our
webservers didn't work any more and all he got was an
ICMP-unreachable with un-NATed
Am Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:48:56 -0400
schrieb Daniel Villarreal :
> I was posting to advoc...@openbsd.org, but only SPAM seems to
> function on that list?
Well, for whatever reason it ended at b...@openbsd.org ...
Beside the question what kind of "encryption" your MUA is using...
> http://youcanli
Am Mon, 2 May 2011 19:40:23 +0200
schrieb Tobias Crefeld :
> $ grep flags /proc/cpuinfo |head -1
> flags : fpu de tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat
> clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext
> 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc ext
Am Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:57 -0500
schrieb John Jackson :
> It's probably much more straightforward to run kvm-qemu instead of
> XEN.
Hm, I'll consider this alternative. Till now our "test-LAN" ran on
VMware but for some reasons we want to get away from VMware.
> OpenBSD works fine as a guest u
I think about installing an OpenBSD-guest on a XEN-Host (Debian
Squeeze), all OS as 64bit-version alias "amd64". Are there any
experiences with OpenBSD as Dom-U?
The guest will be a firewalling-router with ospfd, bind, openvpn and 6
ethernet-interfaces.
Any comments are welcome!
Regards,
Tobia
13 matches
Mail list logo
