This works for me on a 2007WFP Dell at 1680x1050:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "DELL 2007WFP"
ModeLine "1680x1050" 146.2 1680 1784 1968 2256 1050 1051 1054 1087
-hsync -vsync
HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
Option "dpms"
EndSection
Secti
That is the most ignorant statement I have ever seen.
I guess we can assume there will be no future versions
of openssh because openssh developers have already
thought of everything.
Good luck with that attitude.
On 4/27/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at
Your default config may be incorrect. Without posting your config, its just
a guessing game.
On 4/24/07, thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have the same problem with the new debian 4.0.
> Default sshd_config/ssh_config.
> I am not able to ssh into openbsd-3.9.
>
> authlog on openbsd-server:
I can verify that ssh between Ubuntu 7.04 and openbsd is completely
working. Your issue is with your /etc/ssh_config.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/24/07, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > just to eliminate the obvious: you have checked that name resolution
> > (forwards and backwa
This isn't an OpenBSD specific solution, but you should be able to use an
EMC san to accomplish this (we use a fiber channel setup)
On 4/19/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2007/04/19 18:08, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >>I don't think NFS/AFS is that
His problem was not about ntpd not syncing. At any rate, Reza, do you have
any firewalls that could be blocking the port? If you switch "listen on
192.168.1.1" to "listen on *" does that change your situation?
On 4/8/07, Mispunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It will take some time before ntpd b
There are two roads, the high and the low road. I am not sure why an adult
(assuming) needs to be educated on this. The guy took code and relicensed
it. That sucks. We know. But instead of trying to work with him, and
educated him (since he does do a ton of work on free software), Michael
effe
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS
HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30
seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and
embarrassment.
On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
I think it is sad, and a horrible representation of GPL coders. Michael
doesn't speak for all of us, and it is clear to anyone with common
sense that the first thing you do is contact in private.
On 4/5/07, Bret Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:16 -0600, Diana Eicher
I am sick of messing with my XG-600 PRISM54 based wireless card. It does
have Linux support (in Ubuntu), and I haven't tried it in OpenBSD but I know
FreeBSD doesn't have a driver by default for it. If there is a developer
out
there who likes fidling with wireless drivers, I would be more than h
I would check your testing methodologies, there is no way a system from the
last 10 years can't handle 1Mbps. Maybe you can tell us which tests you are
running?
On 3/30/07, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/29/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an Internet Connec
11 matches
Mail list logo