Hi,
Ok working well now, actually I shouldn't have set up the srcid with my
public_ip. Without this line (or this line containing private IP) it's
working well.
Regards,
Sebastien
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Sébastien Morand
wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> "group none" in phase 2 because of thi
Hello Mike,
"group none" in phase 2 because of this in the documentation:
<<
Possible values for auth, enc, and group are described below in CRYPTO
TRANSFORMS. Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) is enabled unless group none is
specified.
>>
And their documentation says: No PFS. As far as I understan
Hi Mike and everybody,
Thank you Mike for your answer. There is nothing more like you said.
Actually we succeed in phase 1 but not in phase 2.
My client give me the following spec:
Phase 1: SHA1 - 160 bits / DH 5 / Authentication with PSK / CIPHER :
AES-256 / Lifetime 86400s
Phase 2: Tunnel mode
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a NAT-T IPSec VPN with one of my client.
Is this configuration ok on ipsec.conf for NAT-T?
ike esp \
from 10.85.98.16/29 to {10.249.0.0/21} \
peer \
main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 group modp1536 lifetime 86400 \
quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 group mod
Hi Everybody,
I would like to give a try to vmm. If I do so, which os can I expect
to make it work? openbsd ok I guess. Linux? Windows?
Thanks by advance,
Sebastien
Hi,
> Congratulations. You are no longer running OpenBSD. Your system
> has a significant incompatibility, and now we cannot accept any
> bug reports from you anymore. Any bug you hit might be due to that
> change you made. You own the change.
This is true, thanks for the reminder although I
Hi,
> I'm still giving a try recompiling with NGROUPS_MAX et KI_NGROUPS
> modified on a test computer ;-). Then I'll install samba from ports.
Test are concluant until there. I change NGROUPS_MAX and KI_NGROUPS to
1024 and compile all user land and packages required. Can connect to
samba with 18
> No reasonable way. If you really need more than 16, better use another
> OS.
I'd like to avoid using an other OS.
I'm still giving a try recompiling with NGROUPS_MAX et KI_NGROUPS
modified on a test computer ;-). Then I'll install samba from ports.
> As the net/samba port maintainer I thought
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:11:07PM +, Sébastien Morand wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm implementing a samba share on OpenBSD 5.9 and I'm getting in trouble
> > because of the NGROUPS_
Hi everybody,
I'm implementing a samba share on OpenBSD 5.9 and I'm getting in trouble
because of the NGROUPS_MAX limitation to 16 groups per user. Is there any
way to increase this value?
For instance recompiling kernel with /usr/src/sys/sys/syslimits.h modified
(NGROUPS_MAX to 32 or 64)? Using
Hi,
I have a computer hanging up every 4/5 days. It's no more accessible by
network and keyboard is not responding. The only message displayed in
console log is "scsi_xfer pool exhausted!" which is documented by :
/*
* in this situation we should queue things waiting for an
* xs and then give t
I,
Solved the problem by creating a xorg.conf file with the following:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
That's make me confortable to work, but when watching movie I can get some
trouble (black screen in mplayer) and then the display has
I everybody,
Xorg does not crash anymore for a few weeks, but I'm back in VESA mode for
Intel 5500 HD (which is quite slow) when the intel driver was fully
functionnal in october/november in the snapshots version.
Anything I missed?
dmesg and Xorg.0.log beelow:
Dmesg:
ED,ADX,SMAP,PT,SENSOR,ARAT
Hi
I'm using the snapshots version in my computer and for about 2 weeks now
I'm stuck in VESA mode.
I was working pretty well since 26th september for "Intel HD Graphics 5500"
but not anymore, any information about this?
Regards,
Sebastien
dmesg :
OpenBSD 5.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1778: Wed Dec 23
Hi,
Since last update to snapshots, Xorg crash every 15/20 minutes.
I got the following error message :
[ 14956.727] (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0xe9f9407000
[ 14956.727] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[ 14956.727] (EE) Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
[ 14956.727] (EE)
[ 1
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to relay a broadcast message.
>
> I've tried the following in pf :
>
> pass in quick proto udp from any to vlan1:broadcast port 3121 rdr-to
> vlan3:broadcast port 3121
> pass out quick on vlan3 from any to vlan3:broadcast nat-to vlan3
>
> with no success any chance to do it wit
Hi,
I'm trying to relay a broadcast message.
I've tried the following in pf :
pass in quick proto udp from any to vlan1:broadcast port 3121 rdr-to
vlan3:broadcast port 3121
pass out quick on vlan3 from any to vlan3:broadcast nat-to vlan3
with no success any chance to do it with pf?
other tools
> While not an endorsed FAQ or man page from the project, this:
>> http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/openikedoffshore.html should give you a
>> few tips on how to achieve this. The man page (iked.conf) and the
>> references for pf within it should be enough to work it out. But from my
>> observations
Hi,
I set up an ipsec VPN via iked.
on the server :
distantnet="192.168.100.0/24"
ikev2 passive ipcomp esp \
from 192.168.0.0/24 to $distantnet \
from 192.168.1.0/24 to $distantnet \
from 192.168.2.0/24 to $distantnet \
from 192.168.4.0/24 to $distantnet \
Hi,
Yes wifi works fine, scan and eveything, no trouble with it when I switch
to -current, it's really just the graphics card the point.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:41:24PM +, Sébastien Morand wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a Lenovo Th
Hi,
I need help for this problem:
(router1 and router2 are openbsd router, pc1 can be anything)
pc1 ---
|
router1 (b1) - (b2) router2 (a2) - internet
(a1)
|
--- internet
I want al
21 matches
Mail list logo
