Re: Rationale for allowing mount_mfs in securelevel 2?

2005-10-19 Thread Roman Rodyakin
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:44:49AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Roman Rodyakin wrote: > > > I have been recently thinking about trade-offs involved in running > > servers at the securelevel 2. In securelevel 2, it is possible to mount > > a

Rationale for allowing mount_mfs in securelevel 2?

2005-10-18 Thread Roman Rodyakin
am perhaps misunderstanding the concept of securelevel and protections allowed by it. I searched both mailing list archives and Google, but couldn't find anything relevant. Feel free to point me to earlier discussions on the subject, if there were any. Thanks, Roman Rodyakin.