type of emulated
hardware.
Another "problem" when using Xen: the shutdown. Every OS that can not
communicate with xenstore will suffer from that. You will have to edit some
scripts in your environment to make it work with ACPI.
Best regards,
Raimundo Santos
le weight: most of it is my 5 hours
battery.
But it is not that new: a first generation core i5, AFAIK. Besides that, it
is a very good hardware and interacts well with OpenBSD.
Best regards.
Raimundo Santos
Hello,
Lenovo Thinkpad x201 works well for me.
On 19 February 2015 at 17:15, Jack Woehr wrote:
> What's the smallest, most tablet-ish device I can put OpenBSD on? Want to
> travel and stay connected.
>
> --
> Jack Woehr # "There's too much emphasis on things
> Box 51, Golden CO 80
Thank you very much, Otto!
Almost one day of test after configuring _unbound class, and no more "Too
many open files".
Once more, thank you for your time, and happy new year.
Raimundo Santos
On 30 December 2014 at 11:14, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:
resources just for Unbound, how can it keep complaining?
Thandk you in advance, and happy new year!
Raimundo Santos
--
Here are some more info...
# systat -B mbufs
1 usersLoad 0.16 0.12 0.09 Tue Dec 30 11:02:00
2014
IFACE LIVELOCKS SIZE ALIVE LWM
Sorry, replied to fast and to OP only.
Below is one use case and a lot o things that Henning have said, put from
my point of view.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Raimundo Santos
Date: 14 October 2014 15:02
Subject: Re: NetMap in OpenBSD
To: Mikael
On 14 October 2014 11:33
and scary in the first sight.
Once again: thank you for your time,
Raimundo Santos
enBSD Project judgment about GPLR/DFARS? (Do not know
exactly how to name it.)
3 - Where can I find more information about GPLR (DFARS?)?
Thank you very much for your time on this,
Raimundo Santos
files needs, I just let it log to
/tmp and the problem became more clear.
Best regards,
Raimundo Santos
/var/log/zabbix_server.log,
but just when I change the line to this file, otherwise the behaviour is
the same, "ungracefully" exits.
In the time of this writing, Zabbix packages are 2.2.1 for OpenBSD 5.5.
Best regards,
Raimundo Santos
well with OpenBSD.
Best regards,
Raimundo Santos
gt; Hi Raimundo,
>
> please use max directive:
>
> queue root on alc0 bandwidth 600M, max 500M
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Loïc BLOT, Engineering
> UNIX Systems, Security and Network Engineer
> http://www.unix-experience.fr
>
>
> Le mardi 12 août 2014 à 02:1
ller
(poor man's 'net equalizer'). My intent was to not put a very high load
over this machine by getting close to my real pps and bps and so make my
capacity planing.
What am I doing wrong with these queues?
Thank you all,
Raimundo Santos
Here is my dmesgs, first from the physical m
put, some ports are not filled, like port
number 6, in bridge0)?
Thank you for your time!
Raimundo Santos
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #315: Wed Mar 5 09:37:46 MST 2014
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8538095616 (8142MB)
avail mem = 8302202880 (7917
lution. Nonetheless, it is an experimental.
And someone could think: why OpenBSD? Well, have you ever tried setting
RIPv2 in other OSes? The more general answer: it Just Works for almost all
things I need to setup. The only thing that I can not figure out how to do
is the WISP's clients contracted bandwidth enforcement.
Cheers,
Raimundo Santos
On 20 July 2014 19:44, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> No, what he meant was that using nc -u can produce false results.
Thank you Adam to point out my misinterpretation. Now I understand that
Sean asked about how am I sure that all those zeroes generated in one host
are really going to the other.
> Th
On 19 July 2014 21:28, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> tcpbench(1) - TCP/UDP benchmarking and measurement tool
Oh, just beneath my eyes, in the base install. Thank you, Philip.
May I loose time comparing tcpbench(1) with iperf?
On 19 July 2014 21:22, Sean Kamath wrote:
>
> Are you counting all those zeros to make sure they all came through?
>
> 'cause TCP is guaranteed delivery, in order. UDP guarantees nothing.
Hello Sean!
Why counting?
My guess, and therefore the start of my reasoning and later questioning
here, is
or there are other good methods?
Thank you for your time,
Raimundo Santos
[1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=135336071024634&w=2
On 20 June 2013 16:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-18, WiesÅaw Herr wrote:
>
> I suspect you may have an issue where state is not being created where
> you expect it.
>
> It's now recommended (and we've changed the sample pf.conf to match)
> to start your ruleset with an explicit "blo
Hello Wieslaw, hello misc@!
I run into a similar problem with my 'litle border' gateway here at my ISP.
We was experimenting with a regular ADSL connection to put what we call low
traffic priority, but our ADSL provider is diferent from our 2x fibber. All
of our IPs are from the fibber connection,
ate set prio
(5,6)
Ville, if you have some idea about keeping states with tproxy in mind, it
will be very welcomed! Thank you :)
Raimundo Santos
I've got the issue solved by disabling states on all rules which deal with
the tproxy.
On 4 June 2013 11:28, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> I am guessing that the problem lies with flags S/SA.
>
> Changing all rules to flags any, and the packets hits the rules, but
> things
I am guessing that the problem lies with flags S/SA.
Changing all rules to flags any, and the packets hits the rules, but things
go worse: no web navigation... this is driving me mad!
On 3 June 2013 13:09, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I asked, without an answer, something
Hello!
If you are following my debut here in misc@ (if not, please help me to put
our OpenBSD to rock this network!), you are somehow familiar with my
problems. I was trying to reproduce the panic in another context, but
unsuccessful... it only happens in production. Well, this is the ruleset:
RF
Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0
]
[ Inserted: uid 0 pid 19584 State Creations: 0 ]
This is the same behavior with or without multipath routing. What bahavior?
Well, only rules for in on em3 that are destineted to internal network are
working, the others barelly catches a few thousands of packets. Very
strange...
But, as said before: more strange is the fact that the cache solution is
almost working, just some delays to load a page here, youtube gasps there,
but overall it seems to work!
Tested without multipath routing, without keep state, and the behavior are
the same.
Will apreciate any kind of help on this, thank you in advance.
Raimundo Santos
Hello folks!
I have this PF config (for whom could not see Web things, this config is
also at the end of the message):
http://pastebin.com/KZgzRJ6B
running well in OpenBSD 5.3 over a Core i5 Ivy Bridge, 16GB of RAM, 120GB
SSD, one 3Com 10/100 (driver xl), two Agere (driver et) 10/100/1000, one
A
27 matches
Mail list logo
