> Has anybody been able to run OpenBSD 4.0 or newer under Parallels
> Desktop? Booting the 3.9 media works just fine and I am able to
> install the OS. Booting 4.0 (or newer snapshots) media results in a
> lock-up of the VM at the (I)nstall/(U)pgrade prompt. I'd post a
> dmesg(1) but I'm unable
I replied to Ben privately already, but the lack of powerpc package
snapshots is due to a short term problem with the machine that should
get resolved soon... in case others wonder.
> > is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
>
> The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
> are things which need to be worked out.
and this stuff is documented in the ldconfig(8) manpage, see -P,
if you want to play.
> Can I use the bg, and soft options in a /etc/fstab entry
> that references a NFS mounted filesystem?
>
> The idea is to allow the machine to boot, even if the machine
> NFS server machine is unavailable.
Read mount_nfs(8), there are options that do what you want. Of course
understand that whil
> "Acer Labs M5263 LAN" rev 0x50 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 not configured
this definitely does not look like a realtek; some references
seem to suggest a tulip. you could try to see if this does
anything (try both de(4) and dc(4) in your kernel), but no high
hopes. btw is this some ancient mothe
> I've installed and configured OpenBSD 3.9 on an Asus P5RD1-VM
> motherboard (ATI Xpress 200), but was kind of sad when I found out
> that the onboard NIC Realtek RTL8201CL wasn't supported by OpenBSD. It
> has only two PCIs slots, but I need three working NICs on it...
> So I'd just like to know
> No no not wrong, indeed I didn't talk about being positive. But being
> prime is being positive (should have said it I agree) and have EXACTLY
> TWO different divisors. And if 1 were prime you wouldn't have only one
> unique decomposition in prime numbers ;) (for exemple, is 45 = 3x3x5 or
>
The Feb 15 X snapshot should have this fixed.
> 3.9 beta was not fun for me, so I am reinstalling to 3.8 -Stable.
> For whatever reason I forgot that securelevel was set to 2, but
> 'make build' is running alright at the moment.
Did you have a problem with 3.9-beta that you want to report?
Otherwise who knows, you'll probably have the same pr
> >That's wrong. And you quoted the wrong patch, the actual patch does
> >this and it's correct as-is:
> >-#if defined(OPENBSD) || defined(MACOSX)
> >+#if defined(OPENBSD) && !defined(__ELF__) || defined(MACOSX)
>
> except it doesn't work, exactly as the OP described. I tested it before
> reply
> Might be a better way in the archives, but...
>
> edit ettercap/patches/patch-src_ec_plugins_c
>
> change the inserted line to always be true, e.g.:
> -#if defined(OPENBSD) || defined(MACOSX)
> +#if 1
> #define SYM_PREFIX "_" // for the symbols loaded with dlsym
> #else
> #define S
> if ((status & (RL_ISR_TIMEOUT_EXPIRED|RL_ISR_RX_OK)) ==
>^^
> (RL_ISR_TIMEOUT_EXPIRED|RL_ISR_RX_OK))
> ^
>
> It appears that the loop will alw
This year, OpenCON hosted a mini hackathon with focus on ports. It
consisted of 4 days right before the conference, and a dozen
OpenBSD developers were present, most of them arriving on October 31st
to spend the next 4-5 days working together on improving the system.
Some of us had never met face
> I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
> But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
> trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
> bug? There's a workaround?
Not sure when, but this has been fix
> > To clarify, if you limit someone's ram use to a certain point, or
> > CPU use to a certain point, it will slow down compiling due to
> > having less resources :) As I said though - I may be wrong on
> > this one.
>
> Yes, that would be the idea of limiting resources. If I am given the ability
> get /usr/local, /usr/ports, and /usr/src remotely mounted from my nearby
> FreeBSD system. I can get the mount done, but I can't affect any files
> ... for example, if I tryi to touch (as root on the Zaurus)
> /usr/local/garbage, I get "Permission denied". i don't have any cklear
> idea if
> I've been testing 3.8 on a couple of i386 systems (soon sparc also),
> including installing more of the 3.8 beta packages than I would use
> normally. So far I am impressed by UP/MP performance, and have
> only found a couple of X applications (xtacy, xlock) failing on signal 11.
the ports@ mai
> I noticed that "file" can identify OGG-Files but if I try to use "file"
> for e.g. an MP3 it reports just "data" even it reports a lot informations
> for OGGs.
>
> Is there any reason (exclude things like "nobody provided a patch"...) why
> file can't identify MP3s?
> I thought mp3-headers are "
> Have you looked at subversion? A colleague of mine is fanatical about it,
> athough we don't use it here.
You mean the one that has 23 build dependencies, and only compiles on
i386? Hah.
19 matches
Mail list logo
