pf load balancing and failover

2006-10-26 Thread Kevin Reay
Hey, On 10/26/06, Pete Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I recall correctly, You don't. :o) slbd adds new rules to pf for each incoming tcp session. Since I couldn't get it to work (old version) I do not know what the session and Sources tables will look like, but I suspect there will be

Re: pf load balancing and failover

2006-10-22 Thread Kevin Reay
On 10/22/06, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again I am looking at the CVS. I can't see its possible to out of the box remove addresses from a round robin scheme in PF against a faulty web server. Am I missing something? But I maybe misunderstood Kevin Reay that in

Re: pf load balancing and failover

2006-10-21 Thread Kevin Reay
Point of correction, slbd didn't have the ability to ping IP addresses. Good call. You might check the code in CVS, it should compile and work on 3.9. Your right, I didn't notice it was being maintained. Thanks for the pointer, and thanks so much for keeping it maintained (I just noticed yo

Re: pf load balancing and failover

2006-10-21 Thread Kevin Reay
there should be a userland process doing these checks and reoving the offending address from the pool on failure. unfortunately, to my knowledge, still nobody wrote something which does it. A while ago I used this with great success: http://slbd.sourceforge.net/ It's open source (bsd!) and wri

Re: Spamd - whitelist of mis-behaving SMTP server POOLS

2006-10-19 Thread Kevin Reay
On 10/19/06, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have been running spamdb greylisting only for several years as my only line of defense at home. At work I have managed to sneak in a Sparc64 Sunfire 120 (OpenBSD 3.9) as a caching web proxy & default gateway. Today, we had a fairly