Apologies, correction:
obsd3# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
Should be:
obsd2# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
Joe
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:37 PM Joseph Crivello
wrote:
> I cannot get reply-to working with if-bound under any circumstances. It
> works fine with floating, though.
> Is this expected
I cannot get reply-to working with if-bound under any circumstances. It
works fine with floating, though.
Is this expected behavior? The (similar) route-to option works fine with
if-bound rules, and I cannot find any documentation that states reply-to
cannot be used with if-bound rules.
Assuming
Actually Windows won't allow you to create more than one partition on a USB
device only if it has the "removable disk" flag set. Some USB mass storage
devices don't have this flag set (from the factory), and if it's not set you
can partition it normally.
It is also possible to flash many makes
If someone successfully attacks the firmware on any of your network cards, you
are screwed no matter what. Any modern network card is going to have the
ability to issue DMAs and can easily root your entire system.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/macros.html
"Lists
A list allows the specification of multiple similar criteria within a rule.
For example, multiple protocols, port numbers, addresses, etc. So, instead of
writing one filter rule for each IP address that needs to be blocked, one rule
can be written
I was able to resolve my own problem.
The solution I found was to create a gre tunnel between the two routers
using the gre(4) pseudo-device. Once I had that working, I used IPSEC
transport mode to protect the GRE tunnel. This method eliminates all default
encap routes from both routers; which was
6 matches
Mail list logo
