On 24-02-13 08:17:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2024/02/13 07:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2024-02-13, Kirill A Korinsky wrote:
> > > > > Good day,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm updating go's syscall table to modern OpenBSD (7
On 21-09-30 19:45:38, James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting that the certs are expired, but https works fine in Firefox,
> > including when looking at the full chain.
> >
> >
> > openssl s_client -servername mail.strengthco
On Thursday 29 November 2018 20:38:23 Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I need help / advice with a fresh install onto a Thinkpad T450s which I
> recently bought on eBay.
>
> The system starts with UEFI enabled and was running fine with a rather
> small SSD without FDE. dmesg from some recent
On Thursday 29 November 2018 12:05:08 Justus Hämäläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that stacking softraid disciplines is not supported, but why I
> wonder? I was thinking about running fulldisk encryption on softraid
> RAID1.
>
> Is it unsupported because it hasn't been tested enough that it doesn't
On Sunday 25 November 2018 17:36:16 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Stephen Gregoratto wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:26:21AM +1100:
> >
> > Would I need to fully grok the code before I could write the docs?
>
> Absolutely not. You could spend an infinite amount of time to
> understand the code if you t
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 16:07:18 Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Nick Holland wrote:
> > So far, with one or two exceptions, everyone complaining about this has
> > a One Big Partition disk layout. A bad idea, not suggested, and I don't
> > think you will get much sympathy.
>
> yes of
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 21:54:36 Angelo Rossi wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> To fix this problem I changed /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/stand/Makefile.inc
>
> line #45 from
>
> HEAP_LIMIT=0xA
>
> to
>
> HEAP_LIMIT=0xB
That may work on your machine, however it is not a change that can be safely
m
On Monday 05 November 2018 17:02:50 Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 05/11/2018 16:38, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > On 2018-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >> Le 05/11/2018 13:48, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> >>> On 2018-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> TLS:
> New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is AES256-GCM-
On Saturday 28 April 2018 22:21:08 Eric Zylstra wrote:
> I’m installing 6.3 on a RAID1. Install was fine until ending with an error
> message, “invalid boot record signature…”.
> I manually ran installboot:
> >. installboot -v -r /mnt sd4
>
> Hand transcription:
>
> Using /mnt as root
> Installi
On Friday 27 April 2018 11:17:07 Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I have rebuilt a softraid mirror before, I was
> just hoping for some clarification as the faq wording is a little
> ambiguous as to whether drives can be rebuilt in multi user mode or not.
Rebuild is a background ker
On Saturday 10 February 2018 11:09:04 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 16:24:38 +1100
>
> > > Just in case some libressl dev doesn't want read the full thread in
> > > the Alpine list, they want also a workaround for the lack of time_t
> > > for 32bits platforms on Linux.
> >
> > We've
On Saturday 10 February 2018 00:05:27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
[snip]
> Just in case some libressl dev doesn't want read the full thread in the
> Alpine list, they want also a workaround for the lack of time_t for
> 32bits platforms on Linux.
We've already addressed this - a notafter
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:55:25 Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> | Hi there!
> |
> | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> | (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
> |
> | Can s.o. verifiy that instead o
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:34:56 Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
>
> Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
> # installboot sd0
>
> it is equally safe to issue
> # installboot
> (th
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 23:26:10 Andrew Lemin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sadly in my testing it seems that CVE-2017-8301 (
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/145) is still broken with the
> latest LibreSSL
> (2.5.4) and OpenVPN 2.4.2.
>
> Here is someone else reporting the same issue;
> https://discours
On Sunday 25 June 2017 22:28:17 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Doh... Yeah, starting from scratch with -r works. I guess quickly finding
> how long rounds take is not quite as easy as bioctl -d and try again.
The number of rounds can also be changed when you change the passphrase on an
existing volume.
On Friday 16 June 2017 10:11:20 LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Karel Gardas @ 2017-06-15T09:07:39 +0200:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:04 AM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Strangest thing is, if I boot with the 'bad' (=failing) drive as
> > > part of the array, softraid brings the volume online (alb
On Friday 26 May 2017 15:59:18 sharon s. wrote:
> On 05/26/17 15:49, sharon s. wrote:
> > disklabel: ioctl DIOCWDINFO: Open partition would move or shrink
> > disklabel: unable to write label
>
> Stupid me, I forgot that the softraid device was still attached.
>
> 12Tb, 14Tb and 15Tb works as wel
On Saturday 27 May 2017 01:56:06 Joel Sing wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2017 01:05:59 sharon s. wrote:
> > On 05/26/17 00:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > myml...@gmx.com wrote:
> > >> Steps to recreate:
> > >>
> > >> dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rsd0c
On Friday 26 May 2017 01:05:59 sharon s. wrote:
> On 05/26/17 00:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > myml...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> Steps to recreate:
> >>
> >> dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rsd0c bs=1m (took over a week)
> >>
> >> fdisk -iy -g sd0 (I left off the "-b 960" because this is not a
> >> bootable
On Sunday 14 May 2017 14:30:55 Bryan wrote:
> OpenBSD 6.1 httpd is (according to Qualys SSL Labs) using "Supported EC
> Named Curves x25519, secp256r1, secp384r1 (server preferred order)"
> when `tls ecdhe "auto"` is used in the server configuration.
>
> Is it possible to configure httpd to use on
On Wednesday 22 March 2017 18:17:12 Jan Betlach wrote:
> Solene, Ken,
>
> thanks a lot for quick responses. Primarily I need to protect the laptop
> against losing/stealing it. Therefore FDE would be ideal, however I've red
> somewhere that FDE is not officially supported on OpenBSD.
This is inacc
On Thursday 02 March 2017 13:28:08 Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Recently I've noticed a number of error messages in my Exim mail log:
>
> TLS error on connection from mx1.slc.paypal.com (mx0.slc.paypal.com)
> [173.0.84.226] \ (SSL_accept): error:1403741B:SSL
> routines:ACCEPT_SR_KEY_EXCH:tlsv1 aler
On Saturday 07 January 2017 21:14:29 Olivier Antoine wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it only me or Tor no longer works on -current ?
I believe this should already be rectified in -current (via a partial
reversion
of src/lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vfy.c r1.54). Thanks for the report.
> Every port or compiled
On Friday 06 January 2017 15:23:32 Timo Myyrä wrote:
> Here's the output of installboot on running system:
> $ doas installboot -v sd1
> Using / as root
> installing bootstrap on /dev/rsd1c
> using first-stage /usr/mdec/biosboot, second-stage /usr/mdec/boot
> sd1: softraid volume with 1 disk(s)
> s
On Friday 06 January 2017 12:24:02 Timo Myyrä wrote:
> And found it. Seems the efi partitions boot loader isn't updated.
It should be - `installboot -r /mnt ${disk}` is run at the end of the
upgrade.
> Manually copying the efi bootloader fixed the boot:
> https://blog.jasper.la/openbsd-uefi-bootl
On Friday 14 October 2016 18:19:21 Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2016-10-14 09:21:24, Peter Janos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > ps.: it would be nice to have a feature in the default installer to
> > install
> > with full disc encryption :) we still have to escape to shell during
> > insta
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 18:26:42 Joel Sing wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2016 09:54:31 soko.tica wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In trying to build -stable from source, I get an error. I have downloaded
> > and unterred sys.tar.gz and src.tar.gz according to
> >
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 09:54:31 soko.tica wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In trying to build -stable from source, I get an error. I have downloaded
> and unterred sys.tar.gz and src.tar.gz according to
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release and updated the sources
> through cvs, according to the
On Friday 20 May 2016 18:38:08 Ted Unangst wrote:
> Peter Wens wrote:
> > On a encrypted (sd1) OpenBSD 5.9 install (amd64, (qemu, virtio)):
> >
> > I created a diskimage (dd if=/dev/urandom of=disk.img bs=1m count=100
> > vnconfig vnd0 disk.img
> > fdisk -iy vnd0
> > disklabel -E vnd0 ( a a RAID)
On Saturday 06 February 2016 16:09:53 Johan Huldtgren wrote:
> > Not sure. Perhaps these drives don't have good meta data due to the
> > crash?
> > Can you set sr_debug = SR_D_STATE | SR_D_META and see if that prints
> > anything informative?
>
> well we now get lots more:
>
> softraid0 at root
>
On Wednesday 28 October 2015 21:26:16 Ted Unangst wrote:
> Gerald Hanuer wrote:
> > Hello misc@,
> >
> > Killing Rebound(8) in current hard locks system.
>
> Thanks. We've found the cause of the bug. Now we're trying to find the bug.
> :)
This is fixed with r1.66 of sys/kern/kern_event.c.
On Monday 26 October 2015 10:42:01 Gerald Hanuer wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> Unbound(8) in current errors out, not starting.
>
> This is not a bug report.
> If this is known to devs@ please disregard.
>
>
> /usr/bin/unbound -v
>
> Version 1.5.4
> linked libs: libevent 1.4.15-stable (it us
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 09:58:57 Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Karel Gardas [gard...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> Let me ask, should SR RAID5 survive such testing or is for example
> >> rebuilding with off-lined drive considered unsupported featur
On Monday 21 September 2015 23:02:39 Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> due to work on SR RAID1 check summing support where I've touched SR
> RAID internals (workunit scheduling) I'd like to test SR RAID5/6
> functionality on snapshot and on my tree to see that I've not broken
> the stuff while hack
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 15:14:17 Andreas Thulin wrote:
> Hi misc readers!
>
> This is my first attempt to ask for help using misc@openbsd.org, so please
> bear with me if I'm making mistakes. Also, apologies if I'm asking about
> something recently discussed.
>
> I want to limit the number o
On Saturday 13 June 2015, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
> > Hi misc@
> >
> >I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
> > was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
> >
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
>I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
> was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
> other non necessary items. I did this yesterday and it still hasn't
> cleared the disk space completel
On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
> On 14.05.2015 15:02, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to configure OpenBSD 5.7 httpd with tls with
> >> intermediate/
On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to configure OpenBSD 5.7 httpd with tls with
> intermediate/chain certificate without no success.
>
> my httpd.conf:
>
> server "default" {
> listen on 10.11.0.200 tls port 443
>
> tls {
> c
On Tuesday 31 March 2015, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> frankenstein warning: stable.mtier.org, all patches applied
>
> the mail server in question doesn't deliver to a certain destination
> ("Network error on destination MXs"). Other destinations work. When I
> connect manually I can send mes
On Monday 02 March 2015, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On 03/01/15 23:17, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am not the best C reader and programmer out there so I try to make
> >> myself tools that may seem useless in order to better understand. I see
> >> this in /sy
On Saturday 14 February 2015, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2015-02-14 02:28, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
>
> wrote:
> > > On 2015-02-13 13:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> On 2015-02-12, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > >> > O
On Tuesday 06 January 2015, whoami toask wrote:
> Hello,
>
> isn't there too much SUID/SGID files on a default OpenBSD install?
>
> Can this number be reduced?
Of course it can!
$ find / -perm -4000 -o -perm -2000 -exec chmod 0 {} \;
> Example: why does wall, write, modstat need an SGID?
>
> # u
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 31/12/14 11:29, Joel Sing wrote:
> >> Well I've already made it working last night by adding a check
> >> for SSL_CTX_need_tmp_RSA before calling SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa
> >
> > Excellent. You might wa
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 31/12/14 04:37, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> After upgrading to latest snapshot I have problems with freeradius 2.2.5
> >&g
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading to latest snapshot I have problems with freeradius 2.2.5
> package not starting.
>
> Especially the problem occurs in loading of module eap-tls
>
> rlm_eap_tls: Couldn't set ephemeral RSA key
> rlm_eap: Failed to in
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Rusty wrote:
> On 11/05/14 20:04, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> I see errors trying to download some https URLs using python, but the
> >> base ftp client isn't affected. 5.6 release and current. One example is
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, TJ wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:33:21PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 23:04, John Merriam wrote:
> > > Hello. I am trying to create a 'headless' setup using a softraid
> > > crypto root with serial console on OpenBSD 5.6-release amd64.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:24:30AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > You could try this (only compile tested) diff:
>
> I tried this diff on 5.5-stable and it appeared to solve my problem! The
> system now boots from sr0a without askin
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
[snip]
> > Since I am not able to boot on the device i have to run installboot as
> > the last step in the installer. For this i need to add -r /mnt (of
> > course the following i
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> Thank you Stefan for taking a look, see comments inline:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:32:30PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > > # disklabel -E wd0
> > > Create the following partitions
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> I'm currently trying to write a library that heavily relies on
> libcrypto. Because I don't want applications linking to it, to have to
> call OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms, for convenience, I added those calls to
> the appropriate place
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Dan Becker wrote:
> forgot to add this relevant part
>
> # bioctl -R /dev/wd0a sd1
> softraid0: wd0a partition too small, at least 536871980544 bytes required
> #
Again, note the "bytes" vs "blocks". That has most likely been fixed already,
however without a dmesg I have no i
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Dan Becker wrote:
> two identical drives... shutdown system remove one turn the system back on
>
> bioctl shows the partitions as 536871980544 which is 137. something times
> bigger than the drive
>
> oddly enough it is 512 times the size of the partition
>
> 536871980544/10485
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nicholas Fleisher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just upgraded to Aug 26 snapshot (amd64) and followed the current.html
> instructions, including deleting the old /usr/sbin/openssl. Upon
> trying to start X using startx, I got an error saying that the cookie
> couldn't be set because /us
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nicholas Fleisher wrote:
> I found another place where the path to the openssl binary needs to be
> updated. Here is a pair of diffs: one for configure and one for
> configure.ac
Thanks. According to matthieu@, the hardcoded paths to /usr/sbin/openssl
should not be used if o
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Denis Lapshin wrote:
> My fstab has identity for main boot HDD:
>
> 548ac03903a985e9.a / ffs rw 1 1
> 548ac03903a985e9.g /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> 548ac03903a985e9.d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> 548ac03903a985e9.f /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2
> 548ac03903a985e9.e /var ffs rw,n
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:04:23AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > > > Hello misc@
> > > >
>
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > Hello misc@
> >
> > I once created an USB stick (uSDHC card with reader, actually) using
> > OpenBSD 5.4 (might have been an earlier that I later binary upgraded)
> > that contains a soft
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Jens K. Loewe wrote:
> Not sure where to leave this one (is there a separate LibreSSL mailing
> iist available somewhere?), but I have just read the announcement that
> LibreSSL 2.0 is available for FreeBSD too.
>
> Can I use it as an "in-place" replacement for my existing Open
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Ez Egy wrote:
> Since these two are using GCM:
>
> www.ssllabs.com: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
> www.google.com: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>
> We wanted to make our webserver HTTPS connection more secure (don't look at
> the self-signed certificate, that doesn't count right n
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, John Cox wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running OpenBSD 5.4 (dmesg below) with softraid in mirror mode.
> One of the drives failed so I replaced it - the first time that RAID
> has actually saved my data as opposed to simply making my life harder!
> Thank you softraid.
>
> They are 3T dri
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Olivier Mehani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been battling with this issue for far too long, and I am at wits
> end.
>
> I have an OpenBSD 5.4 machine, with httpd serving pages successfully
> over both HTTP and HTTPS (with a CaCert-issued certificate). I want to
> serve multiple
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3G
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Federico Giannici wrote:
> For a decision I have to do, I have to know if the RAID1 implementation
> in softraid evenly distributes the "read" load through all the disks.
Yes, reads are interleaved across all online chunks.
> So, for example: with a two identical disks RAID1 i
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jeff Clarke wrote:
> > I've read that softraid crypto uses AES256-XTS for encryption. Can the
> > algorithm be changed?
>
> Not currently.
>
> > Also, how long can the passphrase be? I've red the
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jeff Clarke wrote:
> I've read that softraid crypto uses AES256-XTS for encryption. Can the
> algorithm be changed?
Not currently.
> Also, how long can the passphrase be? I've red the
> faq and the manpages and didn't see anything.
A key is derived from the passphrase usin
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
> I copy these files on a ffs partition they are corrupted. When I try to
> checksum them directly from the ntfs partition the checksum is not
> correct (compared to the same
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:16:44PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> > > Maybe a stupid question, but is it possible to have a i386 machine
> > > configured with FDE to automatica
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:33:51AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
> > [...snip...] FWIW one of my servers (handles mail, etc) is a Sun Fire
> > V210 (sparc64) machine with 2x1GHz CPU, 2GB RAM and a pair of SCSI drives
> > - it runs perfectly well i
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Anyone having any experience with putting an softraid CRYPTO partition
> on top of a softraid RAID 1? In terms of performance?
>
> I'd like to build a file server that favors redundancy, availability and
> privacy over performance. The lat
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013, tichodr...@free.fr wrote:
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I failed to upgrade my server from 5.2 to 5.3, probably because of a
> > bad answer to the 'Root filesystem?' question.
> >
> > Setup:
On Wed, 15 May 2013, tichodr...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I failed to upgrade my server from 5.2 to 5.3, probably because of a
> bad answer to the 'Root filesystem?' question.
>
> Setup:
> - HP ProLiant MicroServer N40L server, amd64, GENERIC kernel
> - Two disks (sd0, sd1) in softraid (
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, keith scott wrote:
> After changing the following line on our edge Firewalls PC.conf the Centos
> server that was unusable is now usable. I've done another tcp dump and
> there are still lot's of TCP ACT DUP's but not as many as there were
> before,
>
> match on $ExtIf scrub
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> By the way, does softraid on amd64 support 4096 bytes per sector?
No. There is a large amount of work required to fix this since everything in
softraid was originally designed around 512-byte blocks. It is somewhere on
my TODO list, however I do not cu
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> Anyone else having trouble getting bioctl to see more than 2TB when
> creating softraid0?
>
> I've got 2 x 3TB drives, BIOS sees them fine.
>
> dmesg on bootup:
>
> sd1 at scsibus0 targ 3 lun 0: SCSI3 0/direct
> fixed naa.5000c5005e0bcda5
> sd1: 2861588M
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Joel Sing on Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:44:11 +1100:
> > umount via DUID does not work currently - this will be fixed shortly
> > after the next release freeze has ended.
>
> Will that also include shutdown of softraid via D
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 02/08/13 11:26, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> >>> While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
>
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-08, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> >| What kind of hardware do you have powering those machines? Besides,
> >| I don't use the crypto partition too often and I really should make
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
> > supported (for a variety of reasons). The problem that you mention above
> > is due to the way that
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
> I get a rather curious error when shutting down a machine with a RAID 1
> setup that contains a crypto partition and a "normal" partition:
>
> syncing disks... done
> sd3 detached
> softraid0: I/O error 5 on dev 0x433 at block 16
> softraid0: could not w
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:11:17AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> > I hate to say it but I am sure your hard disk is dying. Replace it ASAP
>
> No no, that's all right. Death is an inevitable part of life. I know the
> disk is dying and I'm going
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:33:16AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Trying to play around a bit with softraid using vnd reliably results
> > >
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just installed OpenBSD 5.2 on my Soekris 6501. Im using two WDC
> WD2500BPVT-22JJ5T0 disks in RAID1.
>
> Installation goes well and the system boots fine the first time.
> After reboot I'm greeted with the following error:
>
> Using dr
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> I wrote
>
> | FreeBSD has the BSD-Sysctl perl module available from CPAN, which would
> | be ideal for my purposes... except that it doesn't (yet) support OpenBSD.
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > So, uh, what fails if you try to b
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Trying to play around a bit with softraid using vnd reliably results
> in a panic when assembling the raid volume. I think the first time I
> tried this was around 4.9 so it's not something new.
>
> While the combination of vnd and softraid ma
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Doing Per-Olov's advice on
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133771632704741&w=2
> and applying the following, fixes the problem.
>
> Should I stick with this or is there another reason it has not been
> included in current so far?
Yes - it is a
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> I'm running current on a ThinkPad T500 with a fully encrypted disk (sd0)
> and using a usb keydisk (sd1) to assemble the crypto volume on sd2. Last
> snapshot upgrade was around 11th of October.
>
> Yesterday the machine suddenly stopped responding to k
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Marcin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded to 5.1, but I was able to reproduce the issue
> described below with 4.8, 5.0 and 5.2 snapshot.
>
> After the upgrade I discovered that workstations behind the OpenBSD
> firewall experience occasional timeouts
> while trying to access
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I went and tried files I had produced many months ago and I get same error!
>
> ./cat[1]: syntax error: `(' unexpected
>
> I don't think the problem is with nasm, but something else?
For some reason the kernel does not think it is a valid executable - ca
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> >
> > It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
> > you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
> >
>
> Sorry for not mention
On Tuesday 22 May 2012, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was running 4.9 on this server and finally got it
> updated to 5.0 and right after to 5.1.
> But security(8) now gives me this:
> disklabel: partition a: partition extends past end of unit
> sd1 is a softraid crypto volume and runni
On Saturday 24 March 2012, Brett wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:30:40 -0400
>
> Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 03/23/12 22:02, Brett wrote:
> > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:43:53 +0100
> > >
> > > Henning Brauer wrote:
> > >> * Brett [2012-03-24 01:56]:
> > >> > > its normal behaviour. from xorg.conf(5
On Monday 23 January 2012, Matt Behrens wrote:
> Been playing with 5.1-beta (Jan. 21 build) in the interests of seeing
> what I need to get together to set up my next system. I was hoping to
> do it with three drives, booting from a softraid RAID 5 volume.
>From bioctl(8):
CAVEATS
Use of th
On Monday 16 January 2012, keith wrote:
> I built a storage server to run the Bacula storage daemon on. My plan
> was to boot of a usb key then to use the four 2TB sata disks that are in
> the server as a softraid raid 5 volume. The server in question is a dell
> poweredge R310, i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07G
On Thursday 15 December 2011, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> I read a long time ago that layered softraid wasn't supported, and
> when looking recently I didn't read anything which suggested that had
> changed, however on the off-chance I tried it out and it seems to work
> ok - at least in limited testi
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to reassemble a softraid(4) volume, created with the 'force'
> flag. When I'm trying:
> # bioctl -C force -c C -l /dev/sd1a softraid0
> softraid0: chunk sd1a already in use
> bioctl: ioctl: Invalid argument
>
> Accordin
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Jiri B wrote:
> would be possible to tell kernel via `bsd -a' or with extended
> boot.conf configuration capabilities to use a root device defined
> with DUID?
Short answer, no.
> My intend is to boot from an external usb stick and to have root device
> in the box con
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
